Since energy is lost in the roller coaster due to friction, the hill should little lower than the starting height since some of the kinetic energy at the bottom of the first hill is lost due to friction so it will not have as much potential energy at the top of the next hill.
A roller coaster is a good way to demonstrate the principle of conservation of energy. Recall that energy is neither created nor destroyed but can be converted from one form to another.
In a roller coaster, all the heights are not the same because energy is lost along the line. Therefore, the students must bear in mind that the hill should be at least a little lower than the starting height because some of the kinetic energy at the bottom of the first hill will be converted to other types of energy due to friction so it will not have as much potential energy at the top of the next hill.
Learn more: brainly.com/question/14281129
It’s distance for my answer but tell me if anyone tells u this answer thanks
Answer: The answers are A. Wind, B. Water, and D. Gravity.
Explanation: All four factors contribute to weathering and erosion; however, ice is not shown in the image, so it likely did not play a role in the collapse of the cliff.
(Next time please provide an image so it would be easier!)
Answer:
If the force applied is larger than 185.2 N, yes.
Explanation:
In order to move the table, the pushing force must be larger than the frictional force. The frictional force is given by:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0232/f02325e8b62906e9b2135035ac3ca2ffee327c79" alt="F_f = \mu mg"
where
is the coefficient of static friction
is the mass of the table
is the gravitational acceleration
Substituting,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ab972/ab972c6a0f840d2c5e60b44c6ef79c394f502ed6" alt="F_f=(0.42)(45 kg)(9.8 m/s^2)=185.2 N"
So, we are able to move the table if we push with a force larger than 185.2 N.