1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nikklg [1K]
4 years ago
11

​E: A randomly selected person accidentally killing a spider. ​F: A different randomly selected person accidentally swallowing a

spider. A. E cannot affect F and vice versa because the people were randomly​ selected, so the events are independent. B. E cannot affect F because​ "person 1 accidentally killing a spider​" could never​ occur, so the events are neither dependent nor independent. C. E can affect the probability of F because the people were randomly​ selected, so the events are dependent. D. E can affect the probability of​ F, even if the two people are randomly​ selected, so the events are dependent.
Mathematics
1 answer:
alexdok [17]4 years ago
5 0

Answer:

A. E cannot affect F and vice versa because the people were randomly​ selected, so the events are independent.

Step-by-step explanation:

Imagine a situation.

We probably live very far from each other

There is a probability that I kill a spider.

There is a probability that you accidentaly swallows a spider.

Or vice-versa.

If I kill a spider, i won't impact the probability that you accidentaly swallows a spider. So these events are independent, and the correct answer is:

A. E cannot affect F and vice versa because the people were randomly​ selected, so the events are independent.

You might be interested in
An automobile originally purchased for $18,000 is losing value at a rate of 15% per year. The number of dollars it will be worth
matrenka [14]

Answer:

b

Step-by-step explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
A newsletter publisher believes that 30% of their readers own a Rolls Royce. A testing firm believes this is inaccurate and perf
fredd [130]

Answer:

The evidence is not sufficient at the 0.02 level of significance to reject the claim that the percentage is 30%.

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's first state the null and alternative hypotheses for this research;

H0: p = 0.30

Ha: p ≠ 0.30

Now, since the bull hypothesis is the claim and he fails to reject the null hypothesis from the research, we will conclude that;

The evidence is not sufficient at the 0.02 level of significance to reject the claim that the percentage is 30%.

5 0
3 years ago
*************MUST ANSWER!***************
dem82 [27]

Answer:

Look Down

Step-by-step explanation:

85+2.5v=115

2.5v=30

v=12

4 0
3 years ago
What is the scale factor from the smaller rectangle to the larger rectangle pictured below?
Bess [88]
3the answer is A I think 3.5
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
QUESTION 3 PLS HELP ME
tangare [24]
13 because it says it right there that’s is the correct one o
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Given a line whose slope is, m, is -6/5, and passes through point (-5,3), the graph will?
    8·1 answer
  • The amount of money the athletic booster club raised for the year is modeled by the function f(x) = 250x + 750. How much money d
    6·2 answers
  • Lateral area of the cylinder and volume of cylinder
    10·1 answer
  • Monroe is gift wrapping a box that has the shape of a right rectangle or prism the box has a length of 20 cm a width of 7 cm and
    12·1 answer
  • Solve the equation r - 3.9 = -9.3
    6·1 answer
  • Please help due tonight !
    6·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP ASAP
    12·1 answer
  • Please help, I really need this. Please answer with A,B,C or D.
    13·2 answers
  • The sum of three numbers is 19 two times the first number is increased by six times the second number plus the third number is 1
    9·1 answer
  • Write an equation for the nth term of the arithmetic sequence.<br> 2, 5, 8, 11, ...
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!