Answer:
Unitary cost= $12.30
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Overhead rate:
Rate 1= 150% of material costs
Rate 2= $7.25 per direct labor hour.
Production:
540 neckties
raw materials= $2,110
Direct labor hours= 69 direct labor hours at a total cost of $865.
First, we need to calculate the total cost:
Total cost= 2,110 + 865 + (1.5*2,110 + 7.25*69)
Total cost= $6,640.25
Unitary cost= 6,640.25/540= $12.30
Answer:
4/11 and 6/15 dressers.
Explanation:
Absolute advantage is the ability of a country to produce more of a product given the same resources than another country per unit time. It also applies when a country is able to produce same amount of goods with another country given less inputs.
So a country that produces more goods uses a more efficient process to get more output.
In this scenario a worker in Peru can produce 11 lamps or 4 dressers in a day and a worker in Canada can produce 15 lamps or 6 dressers in a day. Canada has absolute advantage in producing lamps and dressers, so importing these items will not be beneficial.
To get a balance where both countries will benefit a lamp will have to go for a ratio of each countrie's product to the opportunity cost.
That is for Peru to produce 4 dressers it will have opportunity cost of 11 lamps. So the ratio is 4/11.
Also for Canada to produce 6 dressers it will have opportunity cost of 15 lamps. So the ratio is 6/15.
Lamp should trade for between 4/11 to 6/15 dressers for both countries to benefit.
Answer:
I= $1,600
Explanation:
We have to clear Investment from the GDP formula:
GDP= Consumption (C)+ Investment (I)+ Government expenditure (G)+ Net exports (exports-imports)
I=GDP-G-C-(X-M)
The problem gives this information:
GDP: $10,000
G: $2,000
C: $6,000
X: $1,000
M: $600
I= $10,000-$2,000-$6,000-($1,000-$600)
Investment in 2010=$1,600
Answer:
Synergy.
Explanation:
Synergy is the benefit that results when two or more agents work together to achieve something in a fruitful way, like the increased customer value, which either one could not have achieved on its own. It is the concept of the whole being greater than the sum of individual effects.
Bad Debts Expense is debited when an account is determined to be <u>uncollectible</u> under the direct write-off method of accounting for uncollectible accounts,
Bad Debts Expense refers to the portion of account receivables that a firm has assumes not be recoverable from the debtor.
In conclusion, the Bad Debts Expense is debited when an account is determined to be <u>uncollectible</u> under the direct write-off method of accounting for uncollectible accounts,
Read more about Bad Debts Expense
<em>brainly.com/question/25229686</em>
