Answer:
16
Step-by-step explanation:
3x - 4 =  (10x - 72)
(10x - 72)
⇔ 6x - 8 = 10x - 72
⇔ 4x = 64
⇔ x = 16
 
        
             
        
        
        
A) See picture for the table.
To make the table, multiply 47774 by 1.5% to get total that have diabetes and multiply 5855 by 2.5% to get total unemployed that have it, then using subtraction fill in the other squares of the table.
B)
Hypothesis:
H0: No association between employment and diabetes.
H1: Association between the two
Using a graphing calculator or Excel, run a chi-test.
Chi squared equals 31.844 with 1 degrees of freedom.
  The two-tailed P value is less than 0.0001
With this information we can reject the null hypothesis and conclude there is an association between diabetes and employment.
C)
Although there is a statistical significance, there really is no practical significance between an incidence rate of 1.5 or 2.5%
 
        
             
        
        
        
I took a test on this yesterday and all i know is the answer is either 81 117 or 162
        
             
        
        
        
An absolute value inequality that represents the weight of a 5-foot male who would not meet the minimum or maximum weight requirement allowed to enlist in the Army is 97 lbs < x < 132 lbs.
<h3>What are inequalities?</h3>
Inequalities help us to compare two unequal expressions. Also, it helps us to compare the non-equal expressions so that an equation can be formed.
It is mostly denoted by the symbol <, >, ≤, and ≥.
The median weight for a 5 foot tall male to enlist in the US Army is 114.5 lbs. This weight can vary by 17.5 lbs. Therefore, the inequality can be written as,
(114.5 - 17.5) lbs < x < (114.5 + 17.5) lbs 
97 lbs < x < 132 lbs
Hence, an absolute value inequality that represents the weight of a 5-foot male who would not meet the minimum or maximum weight requirement allowed to enlist in the Army is 97 lbs < x < 132 lbs.
Learn more about Inequality:
brainly.com/question/19491153
#SPJ1