The FRCP 26(a)(2)(B) (Rule 26)
The FRCP 26(a)(2)(B) is a requirement for the expert witness. If the expert fails to include this, then there is a high chance that the testimony can be thrown out.
I hope this helps! :)
Answer:
This statement means that all victims of crime of any form, either armed robbery, kidnapping, fraud, should be treated with compassion and respect because of the ordeal they went through. It is also mentioned that their rights must not be violated on any account, but rather protected.
Answer:
tort is like when you sue some one. It is for personal injury ect. You are not placed in jail just fines and things like that
crime is where you go to jail maybe and it is explicitly against the law ex sealing
Explanation:
Answer:
A
Explanation:
After 2/3 of Congress votes to pass an amendment it is sent to States for approval. 3/4 of the states (38) must approve before it is ratified to the U.S Constitution. This is done by a vote in the State Legislature or a special ratifying convention.
Answer: diffuse costs and concentrated benefits
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed that police in Appleton, Wisconsin, shut down a lemonade stand run by two young girls as the girls, were subject to a recent ordinance that barred anyone from selling products within a two-block radius of local events.
We are further told that local alderman Peter Stueck defended the law, saying, "It's certainly not that Appleton is against little girls setting up their cookie and lemonade stands but the overall intent of the ordinance was to protect the vendors at these events.
The concept uses here is diffuse costs and concentrated benefits. The main argument is that there will be overpresentation of the concentrated minor interests and the majority interests will be trumped. It should be noted that this concept come into place because of the free rider problem.