I believe the answer is: inductive reasoning
In inductive reasoning, the premises would be viewed as some sort of supply of evidence for the general conclusion. In the example above,
"all professional athletes earn a lot of money" is the premise that is used as some sort of evidence for " wes makes a lot of money", which is the speaker's conclusion.
These types of damages are called “Compensatory damages”.
<span>Willis breached the contract but the breach was not
material. So as a way to compensate for the damages Willis have made, he
offered instead to pay $300 to put the correct faucets and linoleum in the
powder room.</span>
Answer:
Cash $60,000 (debit)
Investment Income $60,000 (credit)
Explanation:
It is Important to note that the Acquirer (Horicon Corp) is a Corporate.
The Acquisition of 25% of the common stock of Sheboygan Corp constitute an Asset for Horicon Corp since Economic Benefits are expected to be received from the Investment.
The Receipt of Dividends from these shares will constitute Investment Income and the entry is as follows :
Cash $60,000 (debit)
Investment Income $60,000 (credit)
Nmskkkqkokswkkijnw!!!! Yes
Answer:
<u>Annual rate of return which will be earned from today is 5.89%</u>
Explanation:
FV = PV (1+r)^n
r is int Rate per anum abd n is balance period
10000 = 6700 ( 1 + r)^n
10000 = 6700 ( 1 + r)^7
( 1 + r)^7 = 10000 / 6700
= 1.4925
1+r = 1.4925^(1/7)
= 1.0589
r = 1.0589- 1
= 0.0589 i.e 5.89%
