It's the bottom on the right
Answer:
The test was not statistically significant because if the null hypothesis is true, one could expect to get a test statistic at least as extreme as that observed 21% of the time.
Step-by-step explanation:
This is the right answer,since this result is only observed 21% of the time, so in general it's not significant, so the first 2 are eliminated. The 2 x 0.21 doesn't matter since, the percent is 21% not 42%, so it doesn't even matter. The last question we eliminate is:"The test was not statistically significant because if the null hypothesis is true, one could expect to get a test statistic at least as extreme as that observed 79% of the time" 79% of the time is a pretty good amount to say it's significant, but it only says 21% of the time.So, it leaves us with:The test was not statistically significant because if the null hypothesis is true, one could expect to get a test statistic at least as extreme as that observed 21% of the time.
Hope this helps lol (: is this a psat or somethin?
Answer:
-21
Step-by-step explanation:
We are told to find f(x) + g(x) for x= -3. Therefore, we must evaluate f(-3) and g(-3), then add them together.
First, evaluate f(-3).
f(x)=4x-7
To find f(-3), we need to substitute -3 in for x.
f(-3)= 4(-3)-7
Solve according to PEMDAS: Parentheses, Exponents, Multiplication, Division, Addition, Subtraction First, multiply 4 and -3.
f(-3)= -12-7
Next, subtract 7 from -12
f(-3)= -19
Next, find g(-3).
g(x)=2x+4
To find g(-3), substitute -3 in for x.
g(-3)= 2(-3)+4
Solve according to PEMDAS. First, multiply 2 and -3.
g(-3)= -6+4
Next, add -6 and 4
g(-3)= -2
Now, we can add f(-3) and g(-3) together.
f(-3) + g(-3)
f(-3)= -19
g(-3)= -2
-19 + -2
Add
-21
Answer:
its 90,000
Step-by-step explanation:
just put the zeros together then multiply 3x3
