<span>The Puritans brought a multitude of cultural features to help them in New England, of those were the high importance they placed on education, the strong ethical value of hard work, and being very self reliant people. In this multiple choice question, the correct answer would be all of these answer options.</span>
Answer:
Freud and his contemporaries viewed conversion symptoms as the result of:
C. the transfer of psychic energy attached to repressed emotions or memories to physical symptoms.
Explanation:
Sigmund Freud (1856-1939) was an Austrian neurologist and the father of psychoanalysis.
According to Freud and other specialists, conversion symptoms are physical symptoms unrelated to any diseases. For example, someone seems to have lost the ability to use his right hand. After undergoing examination and tests, nothing wrong is found, at least physically speaking. Freud believed that that symptom was indicative of repressed feelings or memories, as if the body were manifesting something trapped in that person's unconscious mind.
The answer in both statements are true. It is because an interest party is someone who likely stands to gain as this is a type of individual who awaits to gain something or to acquire something. While the disinterested party is no or little stake because he or she doesn't want to be involved or to gain something.
<span>There's not really any pros for propaganda because essentially what you are doing is lying to get someone to believe something. I guess you could say a pro is that gullible people will believe you, but that's an unethical pro. The cons are that it usually causes much controversy in a society where there's not supposed to be a bias in the government. Propaganda in its true form is never a good thing. It is unethical in the sense that it takes advantage of people who are too lazy to do research and quick to believe what someone tells them. One example I like to use is many of these independent "news" websites. On both ends of the political spectrum, left and right, you find websites that have articles so heavily weighed down with that wings propaganda that true news becomes less and less visible. Occupy Democrats is one textbook example of that. Their articles are so left leaning that you read an article and are immediately left with a left leaning impression. Same goes for a lot of right wing websites. I'm not going to say "always" but propaganda 99.9 percent of the time is not good. Instead of people doing their own research to decide their view on something, propaganda </span>tells<span> people what they should think versus the </span><span>asking </span><span>people what they think</span>
