Answer:
sorry no idea hhcchuucghhf
Null hypothesis: There is no significant association between the existing process and the new process for reducing the population proportion of screens that will be rejected
.
Alternative hypothesis :There is a significant association between the existing process and the new process for reducing the population proportion of screens that will be rejected
.
Finally the null hypothesis will be rejected and we should accept the alternate hypothesis
Step-by-step explanation:
In the existing process the sample size and population was not known.,but the percentage of rejected screens were given as 12%.,but in the new process out of 100 screens only 6 are rejected
percentage of rejected screens using new process = 6÷ 100 ×100 = 6%
percentage of rejected screens using existing (old) process = 12%
so the new process is the effective one which reduces the rejection rate of screens., hence it is concluded that There is a significant association between the existing process and the new process for reducing the population proportion of screens that will be rejected
.
so the null hypothesis will be rejected and we should accept the alternate hypothesis
Apply the power rule and multiply exponents,
(
a
m
)
n
=
a
m
n
(
a
m
)
n
=
a
m
n
.
x
5
⋅
5
x
5
⋅
5
Multiply
5
5
by
5
5
.
x
25
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
For complete solution kindly refer to the attachment .
