1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sergio039 [100]
3 years ago
14

What is mightier than steel yet cowers from the sun?

Physics
2 answers:
Levart [38]3 years ago
6 0

Ice is mightier than steel yet cowers from the sun.

Explanation

Steel is the hardest metal used in building heavy vessels for sailing or other kind of transportation.

But as it is a metal, it has freezing point so the steel may get frozen leading to failure in the working of ships at low temperatures.

Even vessels like ships, submarines can break if collided with ice blocks in the northern pole region.

So ice has the capacity to weaken the steel but it will melt easily in sunlight.

So ice is the one which mightier than steel yet cowers from the sun.

JulijaS [17]3 years ago
4 0

Ice is only thing which is mightier than steel  because it can breaks things which are made up of steels like ships but in the sunlight ice melts away it means it cowards away.

You might be interested in
A gun has a muzzle speed of 80 meters per second. What angle of elevation should be used to hit an object 180 meters away? Negle
olga55 [171]
Knowing the initial velocity and angle, the horizontal range formula is given by   R= V^2sin(2teta) / g, so we can get 
sin(2teta)=Rg/V^2
sin(2teta)= (180 x 9.8)/ 80^2= 0.27, sin(2teta)=0.27, 2teta=arcsin(0.27)=15.66, so teta=15.66/2

teta=7.83°
5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A car of mass 600 Kg is moving at 15m/s. Calculate its momentum.
mr_godi [17]
Mass=600kg
Velocity =15m/s
Momentum(p)=?
Now,
P=mass x velocity
=600x15
=9000kgm/s
3 0
3 years ago
A 2-kg box is pushed to the right by a force of 4 N for a distance of 32 m. It has an initial velocity of 4 m/s to the right. NO
rewona [7]

Answer: a) 8 Kg m/s b) 16 Kg m/s c) 24 Kg m/s d) 16 J e) 128 J f) 144 J

              g) 4 s

Explanation:

a) As momentum by definition is the product of mass times the velocity (is a vector quantity), we can write in this case the following:

pi = m. v₀ = 2 Kg . 4 m/s = 8 Kg. m/s

b) In order to get the change in momentum, we need to get first the final speed of the object.

As we have the total distance travelled, and we could find the acceleration, we could use a kinematic equation to solve the question, but later we will need the kinetic energy, it would be better to apply the work-energy theorem, and calculate ΔK as the work done by external force F, as follows:

ΔK = F . d = 1/2 m (vf² - v₀²)

As we know F, d, m, and v₀, we can solve the equation above for vf:

vf = 12 m/s

So, we can compute the final momentum as follows:

pf = m. vf = 2 Kg. 12 m/s = 24 Kg. m/s

Finally, we can find the change in momentum, as the difference between the final momentum and the initial one, calculated in a):

Δp = pf - pi = 24 Kg. m/s - 8 Kg. m/s = 16 Kg. m/s

c) As we have already found, final momentum is as follows:

pf = m . vf = 2 Kg. 12 m/s = 24 Kg. m/s

d) By definition the initial kinetic energy of the box is as follows:

Ki = 1/2 m v₀² = 1/2. 2 Kg .4² m²/s² = 16 J

e) We can find the change in the kinetic energy taking directly the difference between the final and initial ones, as follows:

ΔK = Kf - Ki = 1/2. 2 Kg (12² - 4²) m²/s² = 128 J

f) From above, we have Kf = 1/2 m. vf² = 1/2 . 2 Kg. 12² m²/s² = 144 J

g) As we know the magnitude of F, and the value of m, we can find the acceleration (assumed constant) , applying Newton's Second Law, as follows:

Fext = m .a ⇒ a = F/m = 4 N / 2 Kg = 2 m/s²

Appying the definition of acceleration, we can solve for t, as follows:

t = (vf-v₀) / a = (12 m/s - 4 m/s) / 2 m/s² = 4 s

6 0
3 years ago
What disagreement did Sigmund Freud have with both Josef Breuer and Jean Martin Charcot?
GREYUIT [131]

Answer:

The correct answer is 'A'

Explanation:

I guessed and was correct.

4 0
3 years ago
Which is not true about the role of gravity in the formation of planets?
Paraphin [41]

Our solar system is the only place in the universe where gravity played a key part in the formation of planets.

This is Flase

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • When did robert fulton invent the steamboat
    12·1 answer
  • 1. Meiosis produces daughter cells that are
    12·1 answer
  • Instrumento que se utiliza para medir fuerzas
    10·1 answer
  • you place a beaker of water on a hot plate and heat it up eventually it starts to boil and you see bubbles for me you also seeme
    5·2 answers
  • Why do electrons transfer charge and not protons?
    9·1 answer
  • You are a member of a citizen's committee investigating safety in the high school sports program. You are interested in knee dam
    6·1 answer
  • The amount of matter in an object is called its
    14·2 answers
  • 1) Momenum is
    11·1 answer
  • .・✫・゜・。.
    8·2 answers
  • How many protons, electrons and nurturing does krypton have NEED HELP ASAP THANK YOU
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!