Answer:
they both are smart of how they did that stuff and subbed to TeamS3P
Explanation:
Explanation:
Ethical doubts about genetic engineering motivate a view that many philosophers favour: that genetic therapy to eliminate disease and disability is ethically acceptable, given that the risks can be overcome.
But genetic enhancement is ethically problematic. The line between enhancement and therapy is difficult to draw.
Studies show people who are physically attractive are likely to earn more than those considered to have below-average looks. Does this mean “ugliness” is a disability that ought to be corrected by genetic engineering?
Or, similarly, is having a below-average IQ a disability, something that should be subject to change through gene-editing?
I'm no expert at all so don't take my word but number one looks like it will make the most sense. Because it has the word reproductive system and yeah...
Answer:
option B is the correct answer pls follow me and make my answer as brainlist
