The last image is the graph of
In fact, it is an increasing exponential function, and it passes through the points , which reflects the fact that and , which reflects the fact that .
Now, is a child of the parent function we just described. Precisely, it is the result of the transformation
In general, every time you perform a transformation like , you translate the graph horizontall, k units to the left if k is positive, and k units to the right if k in negative.
Since in this case , we have a horizontal translation of 4 units to the right.
So, the correct option is the third one, because:
- The first graph is the parent function translated 4 units to the left
- The second graph is the parent function translated 4 units down
- The third graph is the parent function translated 4 units to the right
- The fourth graph is the parent function
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The way I did this was I noticed that the graph had a y-intercept of 4 and the only exponential function that had a y-intercept of 4 was
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
4 hours × (¼ in)/hour = 1 in
6 hours × (½ in)/hour = 3 in
Total snowfall over ten hours = 1 + 3 = 4 in
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
1. The result should by a 2 digit number.
So, I fix a two digit number first, say 60.
Then, I multiplied it by some random integer, say 4 and got 240.
Now, 240 is my dividend and 4 is my divisor.
My division problem is:
2. The result should be a 3 digit number.
So, I fix a three digit number first, say 600.
Then, I multiplied it by some random integer, say 3 and got 1800.
Now, 1800 is my dividend and 3 is my divisor.
My division problem is:
Answer:
around 1.3
Step-by-step explanation: