Answer:
The empirical study of democratic regimes in the last fifty years has focused on the question of what makes for stable democracies.[1] Various hypotheses have been put forward and tested about the social and political conditions under which democratic regimes come to be or to endure. A presupposition of most of this research is that democratic regimes are particularly fragile. The supposition that democracies are fragile probably has a number of sources. The frightening experience of the descent of European democracies into fascism and communism is perhaps the most important. But we can also find support for this presupposition in the evident fragility of democratic regimes in the less developed world. And, standing behind these events, is the long standing tradition in political philosophy—and especially, in pre-modern political thought—of disparaging democracy and warning that it is likely to lead to tyranny.
We do not dispute the notion that democratic regimes are fragile. But we observe that all political regimes are fragile. Political stability is by no means the norm in human history. The question thus becomes whether democratic regimes are more fragile than authoritarian regimes. This, we believe, remains a much ignored and thus open question.
The aim of this paper is to present a preliminary exploration of this issue. We present some initial empirical data that address the relative stability of authoritarian and democratic regimes. But, before we begin to attempt to test the hypothesis that democratic regimes are at least as stable than authoritarian ones, if not more so, we must first answer some preliminary questions about the conceptual and operational definitions of the notions of democracy, authoritarianism and stability. This is the task of parts II and III of the paper. We more briefly discuss our data and statistical methods in parts IV and V of the paper and present some initial results in part VI. We begin, in part I, with some theoretical reasons for thinking that democratic regimes might be quite as stable as authoritarian ones.
Explanation:
Answer:
Both the population and geography, directly and indirectly, influence and impact each other and are considered to be a boon for development as a well-skilled human resources leads to the generation of economic and social development.
Answer:
Which of the following represents the experimental design in this study?
A) X 01
Explanation:
The correct answer is A because this experiment has only one dependent variable: the increased fuel efficiency by a new oil additive.
The symbol that represents the measurement of the dependent variable is "0" and option A is the one measuring only one dependent variable whereas options:
B) (R) 01 X 02
(R) 03 04
C) 01 X 02
D) (R) 01 X 02
(R) 03 D 04
E) (R) 01 02
(R)03 D 04
measure 2 or more dependent variables.
Answer:
did u write this song cuz if u did its good
Explanation:
Answer:
Telephone game shows that memory is constructive process. it explains how at each new point the story changes its form by the speaker.
Explanation:
Telephone game shows that memory is constructive process. it explains how at each new point the story changes its form by the speaker.
Referring to the restoration of experiences wherein new information changes, revises or affects those memories. Constructive processes are mechanisms where memories are affected by the importance we assign to events. When we gather information, the memory that produced will be influenced not only by the immediate previous experience that we had with stimulus, as well as by our guess.