1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
viva [34]
3 years ago
7

Help! i dont know how to do it

Mathematics
1 answer:
Lesechka [4]3 years ago
8 0
I think it is 1.6
sorry if i am wrong
You might be interested in
Area of the parallelogram?
rjkz [21]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

A=bh

12.6 x 8 = 100.8m2

4 0
3 years ago
25 is what percent of 100?
Anna11 [10]

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What’s the answer? Help me
klio [65]
The answer would be C.
4 0
4 years ago
A woman is worried that she might have breast cancer. The standard test for breast cancer is mammography. From research she foun
Naddik [55]

Answer:

PPV= 0.432

Step-by-step explanation:

Hello!

Remember:

Any medical test used to detect certain sicknesses have several probabilities associated with their results.

The sensibility of the test is defined as the capacity of the test to detect the sickness in sick patients (true positive rate).  

⇒ P(+/S) =<u> P(+ ∩ S) </u>

                    P(S)

The specificity of the test is the capacity of the test to have a negative result when the patients are truly healthy (true negative rate)  

⇒ P(-/H) =<u> P(- ∩ H) </u>

                     P(H)

Positive predictive value (PPV)

The prevalence of the sickness can be expresed as the probability of being sick in the population of interest.

It's defined as the probability of being sick when the test is positive:

P(S/+)=<u> P(S ∩ +)  </u>

               P(+)

In this case, the population of interest is "Women in their forties"

The probability of being sick is P(S)= 1 /52= 0.019

The sensibility of this test is P(+/S)= 0.86

The specificity of the test is P(-/H)= 0.97

To calculate the positive predictive value you have to reach the probability of being sick and the test is positive. You can clear this probability using the information of the sensibility of the test and the prevalence of the sickness in the population:

P(+/S) =<u> P(+ ∩ S) </u>

                 P(S)

P(+ ∩ S)<u> </u>=P(+/S) * P(S) = 0.86*0.019= 0.016

Now you need to calculate the probability of the test being positive P(+)

You can calculate it as: P(+)= P(+ ∩ S) + P(+ ∩ H)

P(+ ∩ H)= P(H) - P(- ∩ H)

The probability of the person being healthy P(H) is complementary to the prevalence of the sickness, symbolically: P(H)= 1 - P(S)= 1 - 0.019= 0.981

Now using the information of the test specificity and the probability of being healthy you can clear P(- ∩ H)

P(- ∩ H)= P(H)*P(-/H) = 0.981*0.97= 0.95157≅0.96

P(+ ∩ H)= P(H) - P(- ∩ H)= 0.981-0.96= 0.021

P(+)= P(+ ∩ S) + P(+ ∩ H)= 0.016+0.021= 0.037

The PPV of the test is:

P(S/+)=<u> P(S ∩ +)   </u>=<u> 0.016 </u>= 0.432

               P(+)         0.037

I hope it helps!

4 0
3 years ago
The population of fish in a lake grew exponentially. In 2000, a researched estimated
cupoosta [38]

Answer:

a) P(t) = P₀ e⁰•⁰⁵⁴ᵗ

b) 2786 fishes

c) The estimated population will be 24000 in the year 2030.

Step-by-step explanation:

The function representing the population of fish in a lake as it grows exponentially

P(t) = P₀eᵏᵗ

If the base year is taken to be 2000

P₀ = 4780 fishes

k = constant

In 2010, P(t=10) = 8200 fishes, we can now solve for the constant

kt = k × 10 = 10k

8200 = 4780 e¹⁰ᵏ

e¹⁰ᵏ = (8200/4780) = 1.7155

In e¹⁰ᵏ = In 1.7155 = 0.5397

10k = 0.5397

k = 0.054 to 3 d.p

P(t) = P₀ e⁰•⁰⁵⁴ᵗ

b) What was the estimated population in 1990?

1990 is 10 years before 2000, hence, t = -10

P(t) = P₀ e⁰•⁰⁵⁴ᵗ

0.054t = 0.054 × -10 = -0.54

P₀ = 4780

P(t) = 4780 e⁻⁰•⁵⁴ = 4780 × 0.5829 = 2,786.4 = 2786 fishes to the nearest thousand

c) When will the population 24,000?

P(t) = 24000

P₀ = 4780

t = ?

24000 = 4780 e⁰•⁰⁵⁴ᵗ

e⁰•⁰⁵⁴ᵗ = (24000/4780) = 5.021

In e⁰•⁰⁵⁴ᵗ = In 5.021 = 1.6136

0.054t = 1.6136

t = (1.6136/0.054) = 29.88 years = 30 years to the nearest whole number.

Since the base year is 2000, 30 years after that is 2000 + 30 = 2030.

Hope this Helps!!!

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Joe drove 538 miles 9 hours 15 minutes. What was his average speed per hour
    15·1 answer
  • A box in a certain supply room contains six 40-w lightbulbs, four 60-w bulbs, and three 75-w bulbs. suppose that three bulbs are
    7·1 answer
  • 1. Find the Distance of (2,3) and (0,7)
    5·1 answer
  • Which pair of functions represents a decomposition of f(g(x)) = | 2(x + 1)^2 + (x + 1) | ?
    8·2 answers
  • The perimeter formula for a rectangle is 2l + 2w, where l is the length and w is the width.
    11·1 answer
  • if man walks around a circle 2.125 times, how many metres did he walk if the radius of the circle is 4m
    10·1 answer
  • Simplify......................​
    14·1 answer
  • Pls help! URGENT ONLY DO QUESTION 21 PLS
    11·1 answer
  • He sold 50 chickens and 30 ducks for 550 and this monthhe sold 44 chickens and 36 ducks
    6·1 answer
  • You are ordering sweatshirts for your baseball team. How many more large sweatshirts than medium sweatshirts do you order?
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!