2 Points
1 answer:
You might be interested in
Answer:
We do not have sufficient evidence to reject the claim that ,the rate of inaccurate orders is equal to 10%.
Step-by-step explanation:
We want to use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the rate of inaccurate orders is equal to 10%.
We set up our hypothesis to get:
------->null hypothesis
------>alternate hypothesis
This means that:
Also, we have that, one restaurant had 36 orders that were not accurate among 324 orders observed.
This implies that:
The test statistics is given by:
We substitute to obtain:
This simplifies to:
We need to calculate our p-value.
P(z>0.6)=0.2743
Since this is a two tailed test, we multiply the probability by:
The p-value is 2(0.2723)=0.5486
Since the significance level is less than the p-value, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
We do not have sufficient evidence to reject the claim that ,the rate of inaccurate orders is equal to 10%.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Given , Micheal bought a car for $15,540.
Rate of depreciation = 5% = 0.05 { To convert a percentage into decimal or fraction , we divide it by 100]
The exponential function used to show depreciation in amount or value ina time period of 'x' is given by :-
, where A = Initial value
r= rate of depreciation.
As per given , we have
A= $15,540
r= 0.05
Then , Required function :