Answer:
yes because
Step-by-step explanation:
this point, we pause to see if it makes sense that we actually have two viable cases to consider. As we have discussed, both candidates for are ‘compatible’ with the given angle-side pair ( ;a) = (30 ;3) in that both choices for can t in a triangle with and both have a sine of 2 3. The only other given piece of information is that c= 4 units.
Answer:
<em>V≈</em><em>1047.2</em>
Step-by-step explanation:
<em>FORMULA = π X r2 * H/3 </em>
The <u>correct answer</u> is:
0.872.
Explanation:
The correlation coefficient of a regression line is a measure of how closely the line fits our data. Negative correlation coefficients represent decreasing lines; positive correlation coefficients represent increasing lines.
The closer a correlation coefficient is to +1 or -1, the better the fit; a perfect positive fit is r=1 and a perfect negative fit is r=-1.
We can see in the graph that the line is very close to our data, so it is a pretty good fit.
The line is increasing; this means we want a correlation coefficient that is close to 1.
The best choice is 0.872.
Answer:
y=600x
Step-by-step explanation:
slope is 600/1 which is 600 and the y-intercept is 0
Answer:
2k
Step-by-step explanation:
it just is
