I believe the answer is: normative statement
Normative statement is often used as if the speaker is living in ideal world. This statement is usually used to encourage someone who is feeling down. For example, when you try to cheer out your friend that dumped by his girlfriend, you would say normative statement such as <em>'someone as kind as you would eventually meet the girl that deserve you'</em>
Answer:
This statement does not explain this phenomenon: Karen felt a wave of nausea because she passed by a restaurant that made her feel nauseous during a flight.
Explanation:
The cause of Karen´s nausea is more psychological than physical, while the above statement commits the attribution error of mistaking a physical for a psychological cause. The statement in the answer attributes the cause of Karen´s nausea to <em>eating at a restaurant which caused nausea during her flight. </em>However, since the cause of the second nausea episode is that Karen <em>remembered</em><em> that the restaurant had caused her to feel nausea, so she is feeling nausea now. </em>So the statement in the answer is mistaken about the the cause of her nausea.
<span>Apparently, the supporters of the
exclusionary rule argue that the rule is the one effective deterrent against
police misconduct because according to them, the rule must be preserved in
order to guarantee that the constitutional rights are must be honored.
Moreover, in contrast to those who want to see the exclusionary rule abolished
argue that the treat of civil lawsuits should be enough to deter police
misconduct because they believed that the rule costs are too much and it
operates to precent juries from considering highly relevant evident in which it
sometimes operated to allow the guilty to go free. </span>
Ang kahulugan ng bahaghari ay rainbow sa ingles, ito ay lumalabas pagkatapos ng ulan.
Answer:
i don't know what you are saying
Explanation:
plz explain
