Any clue on this one

Physics

1 answer:

rodikova [14]3 years ago

3 0

Answer: First option

Explanation: The higher the frequency, the higher the energy.

λν=c where λ is the wavelength, ν is the frequency and c is the speed of light. So when wavelength decreases, v increases and so does energy.

An AM radio wave has a very long wavelength. It therefore has a very low frequency and low energy.

A light wave has a very short wavelength. It therefore has a high frequency and high energy.

You might be interested in

Helpp pleaseeeeee …..

Lilit [14]

Answer:

300 cos 30 = 40 a + 40 * .2 * 10

Total force = mass * acceleration + frictional force

260 = 40 a + 80

a = 180 / 40 = 4.5 m/s^2

Check:

15 a + 15 * 10 * .2 = T acceleration of 15 kg block (assuming a = 4.5)

T = 15 (4.5) + 30 = 97.5 force required to accelerate 15 kg block

260 - 97.5 = 162.5 net force on 25 kg block

162.5 = 4.5 (25) + 25 * 10 * .2

162.5 = 112.5 + 50 = 162.5

4.5 m/s^2 checks out as correct

8 0

1 year ago

_____ is the total kinetic energy of particles in an object.

maw [93]

Thermal energy (or thermal kinetic energy) is the total kinetic energy of particles in an object

hope this helps

4 0

2 years ago

Using the scientific definition of work, does moving an object a greater amount of distance always require a greater amount of w

tester [92]

The answer is no. If you are dealing with a conservative force and the object begins and ends at the same potential then the work is zero, regardless of the distance travelled. This can be shown using the work-energy theorem which states that the work done by a force is equal to the change in kinetic energy of the object.
W=KEf−KEi
An example of this would be a mass moving on a frictionless curved track under the force of gravity.
The work done by the force of gravity in moving the objects in both case A and B is the same (=0, since the object begins and ends with zero velocity) but the object travels a much greater distance in case B, even though the force is constant in both cases.