Answer:
B. Yes, because 6 + 11 ≠ 13.
Step-by-step explanation: So for this one, you have to add two numbers and if the third number is bigger it is a possible construct but if it less than the third number than it is not a possible construct. So 6+ 11 = 17 (its good so far) 11 + 13 = 24(its good so far) 13 + 6 = 19( its good so far) everything checks out that means B is right. And also it is not D because that is saying 6 + 11 is less than 13 which is wrong. Hope this helps someone :)
Answer: Not fair
Step-by-step explanation: Since the fractions and rations are unbelievably rigid, this question is no doubt going to the creaser side.
Answer:
x = 4/7
y = 60/7
Step-by-step explanation:
3x + 4y = 36
y = x + 8
Substitute the second equation into the first since it already has the y isolated for you:
3x + 4(x + 8) = 36
3x + 4x + 32 = 36
7x = 4
x = 4/7
Take the answer you got from the equation above and plug that into the second equation:
y = 4/7 + 8
y = 60/7
To check just LS/RS both equations:
3(4/7) + 4(60/7) = 36
12/7 = 240/7 = 36
252/7 = 36
36 = 36
LS = RS
60/7 = 4/7 + 8
60/7 = 60/7
LS = RS
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
There is not a slope perpendicular to the lie x = -6
Step-by-step explanation:
In this equation, you are given a line, x = -6.
This is in fact a line with an undefined slope. The slope for a perpendicular intersection is the opposite reciprocal of the slope.
Eg. If you have the line y = 2x
The reciprocal is y = 1/2x, the opposite means negative
So the slope that would intersect this line perpendicularly is y = -1/2x.
There is an undefined slope in this, therefore, you cannot find the slope for a line perpendicular to x = -6.
If it were an option, I would choose "no slope"