Answer:
$0
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that Amelia reported the loss before the fraudulent charges so Amelia will pay $0 because she immediately reported and the transaction was done after her report.
Answer:
The test was not statistically significant because if the null hypothesis is true, one could expect to get a test statistic at least as extreme as that observed 21% of the time.
Step-by-step explanation:
This is the right answer,since this result is only observed 21% of the time, so in general it's not significant, so the first 2 are eliminated. The 2 x 0.21 doesn't matter since, the percent is 21% not 42%, so it doesn't even matter. The last question we eliminate is:"The test was not statistically significant because if the null hypothesis is true, one could expect to get a test statistic at least as extreme as that observed 79% of the time" 79% of the time is a pretty good amount to say it's significant, but it only says 21% of the time.So, it leaves us with:The test was not statistically significant because if the null hypothesis is true, one could expect to get a test statistic at least as extreme as that observed 21% of the time.
Hope this helps lol (: is this a psat or somethin?
The Addition Property of Equality justifies Emily's first step. She added 9 to both sides, canceling out the minus 9 while keeping the equation equal.
Answer:
.878787.. to a fraction is 29/33
Step-by-step explanation:
= 87/99
Simplify 87/99, which is 29/33
