Answer:
Yes
Step-by-step explanation:
6 + 8y - 3+ 4y
Add like terms
(8y+4y)+(6-3)
12y+3
Given that Megan's tax rates were as follows:
<span>No tax one the first £11000 of earnings
</span><span>Earnings in excess of £11000 and up to £43000 taxed at a rate of 20%
</span><span>Earning in excess of 43000 and up to £150000 taxed at a rate of 40%
</span>Earnings over £150000 taxed at a rate of 45%
If Megan earned £158900 before tax last year, the amount of tax she paid in total is given as follows:
First <span>£11000 = </span><span>£0 tax
</span>Balance after first <span>£11000 = </span><span>£158900 - </span><span>£11000 = </span><span>£147900
</span>
Next (<span>£43000 - </span><span>£11000 = </span><span>£32000) = 20% of </span><span>£32000 = 0.2 x </span><span>£32000 = </span>£6400 tax
Balance after next <span>£32000 = </span><span>£147900 - </span><span>£32000 = </span><span><span>£115000</span> </span>
Next (<span>£150000 - </span><span>£43000 = </span><span>£107000) = 40% of </span><span>£107000 = 0.4 x </span><span>£107000 = </span><span>£42800 tax</span>
Balance after next <span>£107000 = </span><span>£115000 - </span><span>£107000 = </span><span>£8000</span>
Remaiming <span>£8000 = 45% of </span><span>£8000 = 0.45 x </span><span>£8000 = </span><span>£3600 tax</span>
Total tax = <span>£6400 + </span><span>£42800 + </span><span>£3600 = </span><span>£52800
Therefore, she paid a total of </span><span>£52800 in tax last year.</span>
Answer:
The left end approaches to + Infinite being an exponential function, and the right end to 0
Step-by-step explanation:
we have to remember the exponential function, the best way to find the answer is plotting the graph or arranging a table of values.
As you can see in the attached graph the y axis gets closer and closer to 0 as it moves forward in the x axis, and as it moves to the left the y axis starts increasing rapidly.
Also you got to keep in mind the way that functions behave in terms of the sign of its variable. for example the 10 in this equation only makes the curve to get wider, but if you change the sign to minus, the answer would be different.
Answer:
To convert a quadratic from y = ax2 + bx + c form to vertex form, y = a(x - h)2+ k, you use the process of completing the square.
Step-by-step explanation:
