Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
symmmmmmmmmmm
Answer:
True
Step-by-step explanation:
A six sigma level has a lower and upper specification limits between 
and 
. It means that the probability of finding no defects in a process is, considering 12 significant figures, for values symmetrically covered for standard deviations from the mean of a normal distribution:
For those with defects <em>operating at a 6 sigma level, </em>the probability is:
Similarly, for finding <em>no defects</em> in a 5 sigma level, we have:
.
The probability of defects is:
Well, the defects present in a six sigma level and a five sigma level are, respectively:
Then, comparing both fractions, we can confirm that a <em>6 sigma level is markedly different when it comes to the number of defects present:</em>
[1]
[2]
Comparing [1] and [2], a six sigma process has <em>2 defects per billion</em> opportunities, whereas a five sigma process has <em>600 defects per billion</em> opportunities.
B 6.44 because 6.4 is equal to 6.40 and in between 6.40 and 6.60 there is 6.44.
Looking at this in terms of sets, let's call O the set of all owls, and F the set of all things that can fly. What this original statement is saying every animal that's a member of the set of all owls is also a member of the set of all things that can fly, or in other words, O⊂F (O is a subset of F). Negating this tells us that, while there's <em>at least one</em> element of O that also belongs to F, O is not contained entirely in F (O⊆F, in notation), so a good negation or our original statement might be:
<em>Not all owls can fly.</em>
Times 4 because, 5 times 4 is 20, 20 times 4 is 80 and so on.
