There is no need for tangential acceleration when moving in a circle at a constant speed.
<h3>What is centripetal acceleration?</h3>
centripetal acceleration refers to the speed at which a body moves through a circle. Due to the fact that velocity is a vector quantity (i.e., it has both a magnitude, the speed, and a direction), when a body travels in a circle, its direction is constantly changing, which causes a change in velocity, which results in an acceleration.
<h3>Which is an example of centripetal acceleration?</h3>
Centripetal acceleration occurs when you spin a ball on a string above your head. A car experiences centripetal acceleration when it is being driven in a circle. Additionally, a satellite in orbit around the Earth experiences centripetal acceleration.
To know more about tangential acceleration :
brainly.com/question/14993737
#SPJ9
Given that,
Mass of a tribble, m = 2.5 kg
Radius, r = 1.4 m
The force on the tribble from the bucket does not exceed 10 times its weight.
To find,
The maximum tangential speed.
Solution,
The force acting on the tribble is equal to the centripetal force.
F = 10mg
The formula for the centripetal force is given by :

v is maximum tangential speed

So, the maximum tangential speed is 11.7 m/s.
Answer:
36 N
Explanation:
Velocity of a standing wave in a stretched string is:
v = √(T/ρ),
where T is the tension and ρ is the mass per unit length.
300 m/s = √(T / 4×10⁻⁴ kg/m)
T = 36 N
Answer:
D) Fusion requires high temperatures and pressures, so how have they reduced the energy cost for it?
Explanation:
Fusion requires high temperatures and pressure for initiation of reaction . There is no chain reaction in it so there is no problem of controlling the problem . On the other hand , the reaction tends to stop as soon as temperature goes down due to heat getting dissipated . There is no problem of fuel as its fuel is deuterium which is present in nature in large amount . The question which is pertinent is that the cost involved in attaining so high temperature is very high so is it cost effective to produce energy by incurring so much of cost . Producing energy by using so much of energy in the beginning appears to be preposterous.