The reason why people come to have different views of society is that a lot of people are said to be influenced by culture, traditions and religions that they they came from and thus have different views.
Another reason is that People are said to be influenced a lot by other people and as such, if their influence is higher if they can get a lot of people to be able to agree and follow their own ideas of what society norms should be and these people will end up teaching it to others.
<h3>What Is A Society? </h3>
A society is known to be a composition of people that are said to be involved in consistent social interaction, as well as sharing of similar geographical or social territory. Its type includes:
1) Hunting and gathering Society
2) Pastoral Society
3) Horticultural Society
4) Agricultural Society, etc.
Therefore, The reason why people come to have different views of society is that a lot of people are said to be influenced by culture, traditions and religions that they they came from and thus have different views.
Learn more about a society from
brainly.com/question/25808021
#SPJ1
Answer:
population
Explanation:
Each state would be equally represented in the Senate, with two delegates, while representation in the House of Representatives would be based upon population. The delegates finally agreed to this "Great Compromise," which is also known as the Connecticut Compromise.
The ethical concepts at the heart of Lawrence Kohlberg's theory of moral development are human rights, justice, and equality.
Further Explanation:
- Lawrence Kohlberg was, for many years, a professor at Harvard University. He became famous for his work there beginning in the early 1970s. He started as a developmental psychologist and then moved to the field of moral education. He was particularly well-known for his theory of moral development which he popularized through research studies conducted at Harvard's Center for Moral Education.
- All his ideas started from the research he performed with very young children as his subjects. He found out that children are faced with different moral issues, and their judgments on whether they are to act positively or negatively over each dilemma are heavily influenced by several factors. In each scenario that Kohlberg related to the children, he was not really asking whether or not the person in the situation is morally right or wrong, but he wanted to find out the reasons why these children think that the character is morally right or not.
- One of the universal principles of his theory is that People have developed their own set of moral guidelines which may or may not fit the law. The principles apply to everyone. E.g., human rights, justice, and equality. The person will be prepared to act to defend these principles even if it means going against the rest of society in the process and having to pay the consequences of disapproval and or imprisonment.
- Kohlberg’s theory has been criticized for emphasizing justice to the exclusion of other values, with the result that it may not adequately address the arguments of those who value other moral aspects of actions. Similarly, critics argue that Kohlberg’s stages are culturally biased.
Learn more:
- Examples of moral development
brainly.com/question/11229593
Keywords: moral, ethics, theory, society, culture, dilemma
Answer:
protection from arrest without cause
English government traditions have some forms of protection from arrest without cause, thus police and other forces cannot perform an arrest without an incrimination. In USA, these traditions as it is possible to arrest without cause in certain circumstances, although without an incrimination it is not possible to detain an individual for more than a short span of time, usually 24 or 48 hours.
Explanation:
Answer:
The differences between a group and a crowd is whether the members identify with one another and whether interaction is temporary or permanent. A primary group consists of people such as family members, whereas a secondary group might consist of people such as students taking this course.
Explanation:
As you saw in the question above, the differences between a group and a crowd are whether the members identify with each other and whether the interaction is temporary or permanent. Usually, a crowd does not establish an identification relationship between people and the relationships that happen are temporary and with little or no depth.
However, groups often establish an identifying relationship between people. This relationship is long lasting, considering different depths.
Accordingly, groups can present themselves in two ways. The first form is called the primary group that establishes the first contacts that an individual has with other people, that is, that group is composed of the family and establishes deep, lasting and emotional relationships. The other form is called the secondary group and is composed of people who have a more impersonal relationship, it can include the exchange of interests, reciprocity and rationality. The depth of relationships in this group varies, but they are not as deep as those found in the primary group. An example of a secondary group of students taking this course.