Answer:
a. $ 90,000 cost decrease
Explanation:
The computation in the change in the amount of differential cost is shown below:
= (Unit cost by ignoring the fixed cost) - (unit cost to manufacturing the purchase cost) × number of units purchased
= ($12 - $15) × 30,000 units
= $3 × 30,000 units
= $90,000 decrease
And the other information which is given in the question is not relevant. Hence, ignored it
Answer: An ethical dilemma
Explanation:
An ethical dilemma is a situation where an individual is faced with making a decision between two options where if any option is chosen the individual might act against his/her moral principle. Like in the question, John is faced with the option of either complaining about child labor and then the child losses his/her source of income or allowing things to be as they already are.
A self-employed taxpayer may be eligible to deduct amounts paid for medical insurance for themselves and for their families, as long as neither they nor their spouse was eligible for employer-sponsored health insurance. This deduction claimed to Claim a non -refundable tax credit based on the cost of the insurance.
insurance is a settlement that transfers the risk of monetary loss from an individual or business to a coverage organization. They acquire small quantities of money from clients and pool that cash collectively to pay for losses. Coverage is split into essential classes: belongings and Casualty coverage (percent).
Coverage plans are beneficial to each person seeking to defend their family, property/property, and themselves from economic chance/losses: coverage plans will help you pay for clinical emergencies, hospitalization, contraction of any illnesses and treatment, and medical care required in the future.
In coverage phrases, the threat is the chance something harmful or unexpected ought to appear. This might involve the loss, theft, or harm of precious assets and assets, or it may involve someone being injured.
Learn more about insurance here brainly.com/question/25855858
#SPJ4
Answer:
The demand curve for Pepsi and Coke would have shifted to the left, causing the price of both products to decrease and the profits for both companies to fall.
Explanation:
As in the question it is mentioned that the if the Pepsi and Coke do not change the formula and all other things being constant so the demand for the goods in case of the competitive market is that the demand curve is shifted to the left which results in a decrease in the price of both goods also due to price falls the profits for both companies dropped.