In a way, all of the answers could be argued for (for example: in the first option: if the scientists' opinions are understood to be "informed understanding of the causes of events"), but one of the options is the best:
Scientific laws describe specific relationships in nature without offering
an explanation.
The reason why I think this is true is that many laws are phased too short and too concise to provide comprehensive explanations, instead they describe the relationships that must hold.
One of the options is pplain false:
Scientific laws explain why natural events occur. -"Scientific laws were theories that have been tested, proven, and adopted as laws." - since they are not adopted as laws.
One mole of methane has a mass of 16 g
Answer:
1.57 x 10⁷m
Explanation:
Given quantity is;
1.57 x 10¹⁴nm
Now;
1 nm = 10⁻⁹
So, let us convert this given quantity;
1 nm = 10⁻⁹
1.57 x 10¹⁴nm will give 1.57 x 10¹⁴ x 10⁻⁹ = 1.57 x 10⁷m
Explanation:
The orbital for fluorine is 1s 2s 2p. All of the boxes should be filled COMPLETELY until you can't no more. How do you know if you can't anymore? By the <u>atomic number</u> of the element. The atomic number for fluorine is 9. So, you keep adding arrows starting from the first box all the way to the last until you have reached the atomic number, in this case, 9.
Answer: