<h2>
Answer:</h2>
<em>Hey, </em>
<h3><u>QUESTION)</u></h3>
This is a complicated question that would be debated by many physicists. How to answer this question when we are struggling with the genesis of the universe? Many theories on the origin of the universe have been put forward, but the Bing Bang is probably, or at least to date, the most likely theory. If today the universe is expanding, some astronomers hypothesise that before the Bing Bang the universe already existed but that it was condensing, according to this hypothesis the Bing Bang would correspond to the limit point of compression of the universe.
But if we remain in the traditional theory the Bing Bang is at the origin of all the matter we know, as well as light. Before the Bing Bang, in other words before the universe, there was NOTHING.
Answer: D. Density of uranium within nuclear fuel rods is insufficient to become explosive
Explanation: Nuclear power plants use the same fuel as nuclear bombs, i.e. radioactive Uranium-235 isotope. However, in a nuclear power plant, the energy is released more slowly unlike in a nuclear bomb. <em>The energy released is through nuclear fission, and radioactive decay occurs at the same rate as in nuclear bombs. therefore, option A, B</em><em> </em><em>and C are incorrect.</em>
The primary reason why nuclear chain reactions within power plants do NOT produce bomb-like explosions is because the uranium fuel rods used in electricity generation is not sufficiently enriched in Uranium-235 to produce a nuclear detonation. This is the same idea in option D which is the correct option.
2.5 cm 1 meter 1 Year
_______ x ________ x ________ = 0.002 m/month
Year 100 cm 12 mo.s
Im sure what is broken down is glucose.
(Anyone feel free to correct me if you think I'm wrong)
