<u>The need to form compacts with other states:</u>
They make compact agreements with other states because they wanted to achieve together and what the neighbouring states having the problems of doing alone. They make the contract for the sharing enforcement data and the development of the water,oil, wildlife.
They believe the full faith and credits clause of the constitution and require each states to honour and enforce the laws, official documents and the court ruling of other states. The states of the compacts to form one to another to have the relationship with the other states.
Answer:
a. The Equal Protection Clause is a clause from the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The clause provides that "nor shall any State [...] deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws".
Its purpose is to apply substantially more constitutional restrictions against the states than had applied before the Civil War. Hence, in Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), Supreme Court held that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause while bodies doing redistricting must be conscious of race to the extent that they must ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act.
While in the case of Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234 (2001), Supreme Court held that the State violated the Equal Protection Clause in drawing the 1997 boundaries was based on clearly erroneous findings.
b. In the case of Easley v. Cromartie, an appeal from the decision given in hunt v. Cromartie was filed in the supreme court of the United States by Easley. In hunt v. Cromartie, the court held that the legislature of North Carolina did not use the factor of race while drawing the boundaries in the twelfth congressional district,1992. It was held by the court that the legislature did not violate the equal protection clause of the constitution and no evidence to prove that legislature set its boundaries on a racial basis rather than a political basis.
In Easley v Cromartie the appeal was that drawing the boundaries for voting violated the equal protection clause of the constitution. The supreme court of the United States held that the decision of the district court is erroneous because it actually relied upon racial factors and this is not in the interest of the state.
In Shaw v. Reno the court concluded that the plan of North Carolina tried to segregate the voters on the basis of race.
Answer: Gender is understood as what socially differentiates people, taking into account the historical and cultural patterns attributed to men and women.
Being a social role, gender can be constructed and deconstructed, that is, it can be understood as something changeable and not limited, as defined by the biological sciences.
The operation is called Sex reassignment surgery (SRS) or Gender reassignment surgery (GRS), and it is the surgical procedure whereby an individual's sexual / genital characteristics of birth are changed to those socially associated with the gender he or she recognizes.
Answer:
B) proactive interference
Explanation:
proactive interference is tendency of previous learning to interrupt current learning.
since here, varian's previous learning of Latin is making him difficult to grasp Greek. It can be well explained by proactive interference.
motivated forgetting happens when people try to forget certain things which they find irrelevant either unconsciously or consciously
proactive interference is phenomenon in which current learning hinders the learning of previous learnt knowledge.
temporary amnesia also known as transient amnesia is phenomenon in which a person losses memory before, during and after sometime of the event(the particular event which one is not able to remember).
