Answer:
The use of the term "ethical" sometimes is a bit too lax when applied to evaluate situations. However, sometimes, it can also be too harsh. In response to your two questions, these would be the answers:
1. The ethical question here would be whether Greedy was right in overusing a benefit that the charitable organization had with the First California Bank. As President of the organization, it is in the hands of Greedy to ensure not just development, but also sustainable development of the organization. However, in the course of his attempts to improve the growth and efficacy of Send Me Money, he abused the benefit of the overdraft, and not to just any extent, but to the negative balance of 10.000 dollars. Although his intentions were in favor of the organization, and he used the money wisely, there still lies the question of if he could not have accomplished just as much, without abusing a benefit that could very well mean the end of the organization. So the ethical issue is that although the intention of Greedy was in the benefit of the organization, he did not take the best interest of it into account, because if he had, he would have tried to accomplish his goals without bringing the debt so high.
2. I disapprove of the way that Bill Greedy acted because he could have accomplished much more realistic goals and not placed the organization at risk by raising the debt to a bank to such high levels. Even if he increased fundraising efforts, it is evident that these were not successful, as the debt is so high.
Answer: B
Explanation:
Through the process of elimination, you can see that b is the answer because the information does show primaries are important, but they dont really play a role in every part of becoming president.
The answers not c because the popular vote does count since they must receive an electoral vote. And d is not the answer because money is necessary for political parties [to fund their purpose]
might be because they're not originally from here and they're not white.
To the founders of the American republic, liberty was the central principle of government.
<h3>The central principle of government</h3>
- According to the right to liberty, no one may be held or arrested unless specifically allowed by law. Additionally, their detention and arrest must not be arbitrary.
- This right is applicable to all forms of confinement that rob individuals of their liberty, not only those involving the criminal judicial system.
- The Latin word "Liber," which means "free," is the root of the term "liberty." In this context, liberty refers to the absence of restrictions and the ability to behave however one pleases.
- A civic society, however, considers such a definition of liberty to be destructive and undesirable.
- Therefore, liberty means using one's freedom within the bounds of the law in a way that doesn't restrict the freedom of others.
To learn more about Liberty refer to:
brainly.com/question/8054690
#SPJ4
