Answer:
Statement 1,2,3,4 are correct.
#1. The reward/control circuits of the addiction pathway are hijacked by changes in brain chemistry altered by substance abuse.#1. The reward/control circuits of the addiction pathway are hijacked by changes in brain chemistry altered by substance abuse.
#2. The "go" circuit becomes overactive and drives compulsive substance use.
#3. The "stop" circuit does not function properly and is overridden by the "go" switch.
#4. Drug cravings hijack survival mechanisms in the old brain and override rational actions of the new brain.
Explanation:
Substance abuse
This is simply known as a maladaptive pattern of substance use. It occur over the last 12 months and can leads to impairment of occupational, physical, or social functioning in a man.
Substance dependence
This is when an individual is having substance abuse in addition with withdrawal symptoms, tolerance or a pattern of compulsive use. The down regulation in substance abuse can also leads to a defective reward circuit (flat feelings, depression etc ) and leaves user with a need for more or different drugs.
<span>The increase in IQ scores over time suggests environmental factors have a strong influence on intelligence.
</span>Our intelligence depends on predisposition and the environment.
Our genetic <span>predisposed is not going to change over time but the type of life
we lead also affects intelligence.</span>
Answer:
Battle of Kathmandu Valley, Kathmandu, Lalitpur and Bhaktapur.
Explanation:
Prithvi Narayan Shah is the Unifier of Nepal because he fought wars to extend his empire. Battle of Kathmandu Valley, Kathmandu, Lalitpur and Bhaktapur are the four major wars that fought by king Prithvi Narayan Shah in order to unified different states into greater Nepal. Places such as Kathmandu Valley, Kathmandu, Lalitpur and Bhaktapur etc for which the king Prithvi Narayan Shah fought wars so the war then named on the place where it occur.
Of course, the range of arguments supporting compulsory voting is matched by a plethora of reasons why the U.S. should keep voting voluntary.
One of the major arguments given by those against compulsory voting is that it leads to a greater number of uninformed voters, noting that those who choose not vote are generally less educated on political issues than those who choose to vote. Critics argue that the resulting surplus of politically ignorant voters has three main negative consequences:
Misleading uninformed voters. It is often asserted that uninformed voters are more susceptible to the influence of money and spending on television ads. A short advertisement is likely to have a greater influence on an uninformed voter than one who already has strong views. This encourages the use of sensational and misleading advertising and may have a negative effect on campaigning techniques. While politicians no longer need to try to convince citizens to go out and vote, they still need to find ways to maximize their vote among less informed voters. Australian political scientist, Haydon Manning notes that compulsory voting often “require[s] banal sloganeering and crass misleading negative advertising.”
Ignoring the wishes of most voters. Since uninformed voters are more easily persuaded, some politicians may choose to focus on marginal voters and ignore their main base of support. Even if compulsory voting leads to less polarization, it may not result in better policy outcomes because complicated and nuanced legislation may be perceived negatively by swing voters.
Dampening the voice of the majority. An additional concern under a compulsory system is that people who are uninformed (or simply do not care about the outcome of an election) may end up voting randomly. The impact of ‘random’ votes ends up being particularly detrimental because it fails to increase civic engagement and may skew election results.
Compulsory voting presents some ethical challenges. Many people argue that it infringes upon individual liberty by denying people the ability to choose not to vote. While it is true that ballots may include a “none of the above” option (though, in practice, typically do not), the act of voting itself may be seen as “endorsing” the current politicians and political system, an endorsement that some citizens may not want to make.
While it seems pretty unlikely right now that compulsory voting will be adopted in the United States, at least on a federal level, it is a policy to keep in mind as America continues striving towards a better democracy.
Explanation:
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: <span>C.Yathrib
</span>
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: <span>B. Alexandria
</span>
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: <span>C. Alexandria
</span>
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: <span>B. Byzantine Empire</span>
