Answer:
The correct answer is GDP would definitely increase because GDP excludes leisure.
Explanation:
The GDP does not measure the level of development of a country, nor does it measure the quality or level of its educational system or its health. Come on, that the quality of life in general is not measurable by GDP, although it is true that countries with a higher GDP per capita can afford better health or education services, as well as better infrastructure and services in general.
It does not measure the state of the environment or the damage caused to it or natural resources by the economic activity carried out. In other words, GDP does not report externalities, that is, it does not reflect the total social benefits and costs derived from economic activity.
GDP does not measure the quality of the goods and services produced. The GDP figures are only numbers that do not take into account exactly what is being produced or what is the quality of what is produced. This prevents, for example, comparing production between different eras. Does a computer add up to GDP now than in the 80s? The answer is no. Does a country of services add up to an oil exporter? The answer is also no.
It ignores the value of elements that contribute to maintaining the level of well-being of the population, such as leisure or freedom. In freer countries or in which its inhabitants have more leisure time and better options in which to invest it, well-being is much greater.
Answer:A. Leontief assumed that U.S. and foreign technologies were the same, while the Heckscher-Ohlin model assumes they are different
B. Leontief ignored land abundance in the United States
D. Leontief’s test distinguished between skilled and unskilled labor, but ignored capital.
Explanation:Leontief paradox is a Russian-American economist, his work was based on the work of Wassily W. Leontief he attempted to test the Heckscher–Ohlin theory ("H–O theory") empirically.
in economics tries to explain that a country with a higher capital per worker has a lower Capital per labor ratio in export than when compared to Import.
LEONTIEF IGNORED THE ABUNDANCE OF LAND IN MAKING HIS ASSUMPTIONS
HE ALSO CLASSIFIED THE U.S TECHNOLOGY AND OTHERS AS THE SAME WHICH IS NOT IN LINE WITH THE H-O MODEL ASSUMPTION.
LEONTIEF THEORY IGNORED CAPITAL DURING HIS TEST.
Answer:
A.) supply-side
Explanation:
Fiscal policy in economics refers to the use of government expenditures (spending) and revenues (taxation) in order to influence macroeconomic conditions such as Aggregate Demand (AD), inflation, and employment within a country. Fiscal policy is in relation to the Keynesian macroeconomic theory by John Maynard Keynes.
A fiscal policy affects combined demand through changes in government policies, spending and taxation which eventually impacts employment and standard of living plus consumer spending and investment.
A supply-side economist can be defined as economists who believes that the ability and willingness of the producers of goods and services to manufacture or produce sets the pace for the economic growth of a country.
This ultimately implies that, increasing the supply of goods and services would cause an economic growth for a country.
Hence, a supply-side fiscal policy is typically designed to create an outward shift in the production possibilities curve (PPC) and shift the aggregate supply (AS) curve to the left.
Generally, a supply-side fiscal policy takes a longer period of time to affect the economy of a country.
Answer:
Some proponents of labor law reform believe that: D. All of the above.
Explanation:
Answer:
False
Explanation:
In the given question it is mentioned that the employees earned vacation pay of $35,000 during the first year of the operation.
Hence,
the expenses should be recorded as the vacation pay expenses in the same year not in the following year i.e the second year whether the employees take the vacation in the same year or the next year.
