Answer:
C.− NA −NA + −NA
Explanation:
As we know that
The depreciation expense is a non cash expense which is to be charged every year and shown in the income statement
Plus it also reduced the value of the asset and stockholder equity as a retained earning but at the same time it increases the expenses due to which the net income reduced and it does not have any impact on the cash flow statements
Hence, the appropriate option is c.
Answer:
The correct answer is: "You would have $589 the end of year 10".
Explanation:
The logics of the statement remains in the amount of money remained after 10 years of savings with a 10% annual interest. This means that, after you deposit $100 now (nº 0), on the first current year you would have ended up with $110, although in the second year (nº 2) you would have made a deposit of $200, which means you would have made total earnings of $310, plus the annual interest of $31. After the second year, all subsequent ones wound count on with an annual interest of $31, which means that at end of year 10 you would have reached the amount of $589.
(ps: mark as brainliest, please?!)
Answer:
$1100.
Explanation:
We have been given that Nyle Corp. owned 100 shares of Beta Corp. stock that it bought in 1993 for $9 per share. In 2014, when the fair market value of the Beta stock was $20 per share.
Nyle's recognized gain on this distribution would be:
Therefore, Nyle's recognized gain on this distribution was $1100.
Answer:
Transaction a
Debit : Account Receivable $27,500
Credit : Sales Revenue $27,500
Transaction b
Debit : Cash $5,875
Credit : Deferred Revenue $5,875
Transaction c
Debit : Sales Revenue $1,500
Credit : Account Receivable $1,500
Transaction d
Debit : Deferred Revenue $5,875
Credit : Sales Revenue $5,525
Credit : Discount received $350
Explanation:
The journals have been prepared above.
Answer:
dual mandate.
Explanation:
dual mandate -
It is the practice in which the elected officials serves in more than one elected or public position .
In Britain , this term is also referred to as double jobbing .
In some cases , the dual mandate is prohibited by the law , as in the case of the federal states , because the federal office holders are not allowed to hold state office .
Hence from the question information , the correct option is dual mandate .
