People should not pay taxes if they disagree with how the government is spending their money but in doing so it breaks the social contract described by many thinkers during the period of Enlightenment. In the case of wishing to not pay taxes, no government services should be available to the person, nor should they be able to function within the society where others are paying taxes. If one wishes to live their own life not paying taxes and not hurting anyway, there is no ethical or moral reason for them not to do such. However it is important to understand there is no middle ground, not paying taxes and still benefitting from a society.
The crime of False Pretenses is also known as Theft by False Pretenses or Larceny by False Pretenses. The crime of False Pretenses requires: a false representation. of a material fact (past or present) with the intent to defraud.
A crime at common law. The illegal taking of the property of another with intent to deprive the owner thereof.
The main difference between false pretenses and larceny is that a thief who secures title is guilty of false pretenses while someone who secures possession through fraud is guilty of larceny by trick.
Hope it helps you:)
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Because the homeowner failed to give the mechanic the manual so the mechanic fixed it without knowing the correct way as it would say in the manual.
I think defendants should have to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to be convicted is more appropriate.
<h3>Who is a Defendant?</h3>
This is referred to as the individual or group which have been accused of breaking the law and is being tried in court.
It is more appropriate for the defendants to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to be convicted because the jury will employ the use of evidences and testimonies in other to give a verdict. This ensures fair judgement and prevent innocent from being punished unjustly.
Read more about Defendant here brainly.com/question/7315287
#SPJ1
