Assuming you mean the Ottoman Empire, the Turks had a massively different mindset. The Byzantine were not religiously tolerant and they actively sought out the conversion of the Turks and other Muslim population. While the ottomans actively gave control of their own land to the Dhmiri a christian estate that payed moderate taxes for religious freedoms. Also the Byzantines had no African or Asian Ambitions like the Ottomans. The Greeks were more interested in Italy the anything else. The Ottomans on the other hand set up one of the largest transcontinental empire ever seen.<span />
Referring to lord of the flies
They used words <span>like "crackers" or "batty".
The words above are very common to be used in </span><span> British vernacular as slangs that often come out in the conversation between common people.
Those are the type of language that commonly heard by the author </span>William Golding in his young age.
They felt that it gave the federal government 2 much power.
I believe the answer is S<span>trength of mass demands
Social movements is aimed to bring a certain positive change for certain group of people within society (based on specific ethnicity, gender, or circumtances)
The only way for social movement to be heard and gained momentum is if it's demanded by enough people to be relevant for consideration.</span>
The u.s. did not send naval power and it was more peaceful
