They aren't equivalent
<h2>Explanation:</h2>
In order to determine whether the expression:
is equivalent to:
Genevieve needs to follow these steps:
Step 1. Get rid parentheses
Step 2. Combine like terms
Step 3. Solve
So:
Therefore, these two expressions aren't equivalent.
<h2>Learn more:</h2>
Writing expressions: brainly.com/question/13894833#
#LearnWithBrainly
Answer:
correct
Step-by-step explanation:
my brain be smart
Answer:
see explanation
Step-by-step explanation:
The equation of a line in slope- intercept form is
y = mx + c ( m is the slope and c the y- intercept )
Calculate m using the slope formula
m = (y₂ - y₁ ) / (x₂ - x₁ )
with (x₁, y₁ ) = (- 2, - 6) and (x₂, y₂ ) = (2, - 3) ← 2 points on the line
m = 
= 
, thus
y = x + c ← is the partial equation
To find c substitute either ot the 2 points into the partial equation
Using (2, - 3), then
- 3 = 
+ c ⇒ c = - 3 - = - 
y = x - ← equation of line
Answer:
the answer is the first one, Cara multiplied only 4 and 7 together and did not multiply 4 and 13
Step-by-step explanation:
if you look through the question you can see that Cara evaluated the (-4)^2 correctly because a negative multiplied by a negative gives you a positive thus (-4)*(-4)= 16, then next you can see that Cara subtracted 2 from 6 correctly because (6-2)= (4), and last but not least Cara did multiply 2 by 4 correctly because 2*4 or 2(4) =8 so as you can see the answer is the first one
Answer: Interviewer-induced bias
Step-by-step explanation:
The example given in the question illustrates the Interviewer-induced bias. This occurs when the situation created by the interviewer is such that the respondent will have to give the kind f answer that the interviewer wants to hear.
For example, in the question, we can deduce that the interviewers told the interviewees that they won't be investigated and the gave bias replies based on that.
