Answer:
The first law, also called the law of inertia, was pioneered by Galileo. This was quite a conceptual leap because it was not possible in Galileo's time to observe a moving object without at least some frictional forces dragging against the motion. In fact, for over a thousand years before Galileo, educated individuals believed Aristotle's formulation that, wherever there is motion, there is an external force producing that motion.
The second law, $ f(t)=m\,a(t)$ , actually implies the first law, since when $ f(t)=0$ (no applied force), the acceleration $ a(t)$ is zero, implying a constant velocity $ v(t)$ . (The velocity is simply the integral with respect to time of $ a(t)={\dot v}(t)$ .)
Newton's third law implies conservation of momentum [138]. It can also be seen as following from the second law: When one object ``pushes'' a second object at some (massless) point of contact using an applied force, there must be an equal and opposite force from the second object that cancels the applied force. Otherwise, there would be a nonzero net force on a massless point which, by the second law, would accelerate the point of contact by an infinite amount.
Explanation:
Answer:
0 J
Explanation:
= Work done on the satellite in circular orbit about earth by earth
= Force on gravity on satellite by earth
= displacement of the satellite
= Angle between the force on gravity and displacement = 90
We know that, Work done is given as
The moment of inertia is the rotational analog of mass, and it is given by
the product of mass and the square of the distance from the axis.
- The moment of inertia changes as the position of the weight is changed, which indicates that; statement is incorrect
Reasons:
The weight on each arm that have adjustable positions can be considered as point masses.
The moment of inertia of a point mass is <em>I</em> = m·r²
Where;
m = The mass of the weight
r = The distance (position) from the center to which the weight is adjusted
Therefore;
The moment of inertia, <em>I </em>∝ r²
Which gives;
Doubling the distance from the center of rotation, increases the moment of inertia by factor of 4.
Therefore, the statement contradicts the relationship between the radius of rotation and moment of inertia.
Learn more about moment of inertia here:
brainly.com/question/4454769
Because it records speed of the car at a certain time, the independent variable should be time and dependent would be speed or velocity. Since it's taken every second, it would be considered instantaneous velocity, which is D.
