Answer:
FRANCE has a comparative advantage in the production of cheese and SWEDEN has a comparative advantage in the production of oil.
- Comparative advantages result form the lowest opportunity costs. In this case, France's opportunity cos tot produce cheese is lower, while Sweden's opportunity cost of producing oil is lower.
France can gain from specialization and trade as long as it receives more than 3 BARRELS of oil for each pound of cheese it exports to Sweden. Similarly, Sweden can gain from trade as long as it receives more than 1/11 POUNDS of cheese for each barrel of oil it exports to France.
Based on your answer to the last question, which of the following terms of trade (that is, price of cheese in terms of oil) would allow both Sweden and France to gain from trade?
- a. 6 barrels of oil per pound of cheese
- c. 4 barrel of oil per pound of cheese
Answer:
Following are the solution to this question:
Explanation:
Calculating the cost of the product sold:
FIFO:
June 1: 23 units costing of 
each 
Aug 27: 23 units costing of each 
13 units costing of 
each 
Total cost of product sold
LIFO:
June 1: 23 units costing of each
Aug 27: 36 units costing of 
each = 540
Total cost of product sold 
Average cost:
June 1: 23 units costing of each
Aug 27: 36 units costing of 
each 
Total cost of product sold 
Answer:$163 which is favorable
Explanation:
Standard Cost per month is given as =Actual Quantity × Standard Rate
= Actual activity for number of jobs per month × Standard rate per job + Actual activity for meals× standard Rate per meal + Cost of Catering supplies
= 9 jobs×$101 per job + 126 meals × $24 per meal +$470
= $909 + $3,024 + $470 = $4,403
Also, Spending Variance = Actual cost of Catering in May- Standard cost of catering per month.
$4,240- $4,403= $163---- Favorable . This is because the actual cost for catering supplies is less than the Standard cost estimated.
Answer with Explanation:
The investment in securities must include purchases of stock of more than 15 industry firms because diversified investment gives an average rate of return on investments. Hence it would be better to lower the risk of investment by simply investing in more than 15 firms and each of them must be from different industry sector. Nowadays due to coronavirus, it would be better to investing in fintech, IT and Hi-Tech industries will pay much more than low tech industries. Tesla is one of these tech companies whose share price have surged by 390% in past 12 months. It doesn't mean that other industry products don't pay enough. Setting objective includes how much yearly investment must be added to you security portfolio so that the net worth of the portfolio keeps growing. The reinvestment of dividends received, insurance of downside risk, investment on the basis of value at risk, etc. are all the set objectives that are considered while investing and managing security portfolio. If you are not confident with setting objectives then investing via investment institutions would be a another best option which had employed hundreds of CFA's who are working to increase the wealth of their potential clients and it is more likely that you take home a better return on investment as compared to a person who has little knowledge of security investments.
The correct answer is A. Increase, then decrease.
