The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can answer the following.
Thomas Paine's great accomplishment toward the American Revolution was the publication of a pamphlet titled "Common Sense" in 1776, inviting all the American Colonists to support the independence movement against the British crown. The main idea of this pamphlet was to convince colonists about the corrupt nature of the British government and the necessity to claim independence.
Published in January 1776, "Common Sense" explained that representational government and the voice of the people were a much better form of government than an authoritarian monarchy.
C.to limit the powers of the central government by establishing reserved powers for states and individuals
B- Ideal self and real self. We can rule out C and D because the Id, Ego and Superego are all Freudian Psychology.
Answer:
<h3>I think this might help you</h3><h3>
Explanation:</h3><h3 />
<h3>With the flu season swiftly approaching and the H1N1 already affecting large numbers across the world, New Hampshire faces the possibility of a flu epidemic. In such an instance, what action would the state or federal government take? The possibility of a massive quarantine gets thrown around every time a flu epidemic exists, but is such an action an infringement of the rights of individuals living in a free nation? Or is the common good of preventing the spread of infection more important?
</h3><h3>
</h3><h3>Even the current health care debate reflects the tension between individual rights and the common good. Over the past months New Hampshire town halls have been crowded with individuals taking a side in the individual rights/common good debate. Some have expressed the view that health care initiatives are in the interest of a healthier state and nation. Others claim that compulsory health insurance impedes individuals’ right to the best health care money can buy. Can the individual rights vs. common good debate help us understand some of the ideological tension behind the current health care discussion?
</h3><h3>
</h3><h3>As many of these examples show, this month’s question is largely political, but it can also flow into other areas of thought. There’s the philosophical and moral question of the Donner Party; if you and five others were stranded and starving, and your only hope of getting out alive is to eat the first member who passed away, would you do it to save the rest of the group? There is the question that comes up around the disabled. Do you build special infrastructure to accommodate the few who are disabled even if that meant the cost to do this would jack up prices. Then there is the commercial/environmental side. What is more important, buying a cheaper car that fits your personal budget and your personal tastes or a more expensive and efficient auto that would help save the environment? What do you think?
</h3>
<span>Since Felipe tends to be the better student, it's more likely that he would be considered the lark. Larks have a tendency to be able to get up early and be competent at things that take place early in the day: owls, on the other hand, are more competent at evening and night-based events.</span>
