An economist would conclude that when goods are not rationed by monetary price or lottery, other rationing mechanisms like waiting arises.
Here, many people were willing to wait for more than two hours to see the rare flower. The visiting was arranged in such a way that first come, first see. The rareness of the flower made no option but to wait in line to see it.
In an economist's perspective, he will compare the flower to the goods. There is rationing for food through monetary and lottery mechanisms. But if there were no mechanisms like this, then waiting will be the only way to consume goods. Here, because the flower was rare, it cannot be rationed by price. But we are still able to ration goods by price. If someday, there will be lack of goods, then the only rationing mechanism we could opt will be waiting in lines.
Learn more about rationing mechanisms at brainly.com/question/14938189
#SPJ4
Your answer would be 63,700. Talk 6% times it by 5 take that sum and add it to her beginning salary.
Answer:
which compression type cause audio files to lose typically unnoticeable quality
lossy
Answer:
The correct option is D, a single organization without subdivisions or individual teams.
Explanation:
Typically organizations are divided along functions and divisions.
A functional structure consists of different departments such as production,marketing ,finance.supply chain,maintenance, human resources and so on,with each function saddled with distinct responsibilities and having its own performance metrics.
Under a divisional structure, the firm is divided into division based on location or products with each division having different functions under it.
However, the Japanese method does not support divisionalization or departmentalization, instead advocated for an organization where everyone irrespective of specialty is seen as a member of a single team
