No, for example, if you had the prime number 23, and you switched the numbers around, it is 32. 32 is not a prime number.
Answer:
6a+12b+18c
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer: g(x) has the smallest possible y-value of -3
<u>Step-by-step explanation:</u>
f(x) = 3ˣ - 3 <em>This is an exponential graph shifted down three units. So, it has an asymptote at y = -3, which means it approaches -3 but does not touch it.</em>
Range: y > 3 (-3, ∞)
g(x) = 7x² - 3
⇒ g(x) = 7(x - 0)² - 3 <em>This is a parabola with vertex at (0, -3) </em>
Range: y ≥ 3 [-3, ∞)
Answer:
(-4,1)
Step-by-step explanation:
The answer is just where the two lines intersect
I'm rather tired so double check me on this but I'm getting about (-4,1) and it's asking for an approximation so think (-4,1) is fine
Integers are written without no fractional components so 12 is an integer .
Natural numbers are positive numbers just like the number we count. 12 is a natural number.
Rational numbers
