Answer:
hen the number of neutrons is known and the atomic number of an element is known, it becomes easier to determine the approximate mass number by adding the two.
Explanation:
Hope it shelps
Answer:
I cant answer B, but I can answer A, and I don't think it is a scientifically reasonable plan.
Explanation:
The bag of sand weighs less than the gold statue, and yes the bag of sand seems like it would keep the trap from activating, but you would scientifically have to put something that was the same weight as the gold statue on the pedestal that the statue is on.
According to the question, the determined melting point of the compound is 112.5-113.0oC. When the solidified compound was retried, the melting point was found to be 133.6-154.5oC. This greater range higher than 112°C is caused by reusing samples leads to errors.
A pure sample is known by its sharp melting point. A pure sample does not melt over a large range. We can see this in the predetermined melting points of the pure sample(112.5-113.0oC).
However, reusing a sample introduces errors because the pure sample may become contaminated leading to a larger and higher range of melting point (133.6-154.5oC) which is far above 112°C.
Learn more: brainly.com/question/5325004
Answer:
B. chemical
Explanation:
Chemical change cannot go back to its original form
Endothermic reactions, on the other hand, absorb heat and/or light from their surroundings. For example, decomposition reactions are usually endothermic. In endothermic reactions, the products have more enthalpy than the reactants. Thus, an endothermic reaction is said to have a positive<span> enthalpy of reaction. This means that the energy required to break the bonds in the reactants is more than the energy released when new bonds form in the products; in other words, the reaction requires energy to proceed.</span>
