1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
AleksandrR [38]
3 years ago
7

The movement of people to cities in great britain was due to

Social Studies
1 answer:
12345 [234]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

a population explosion due to better farming methods.

Explanation

The creation of better farming methods makes the number of job opportunities and food availability become located in the cities.

Knowing this, a large portion of Britain population decided to move to the cities in order to get a shot at a better standard of living. Ironically, since most people think that way, it instead created a population explosion that resulted in a large number of unemployment and poverty in the cities.

You might be interested in
Reformation, Calvinism, the colonization of the Americas and the changes in political power (from nobility to bourgeoisie) durin
xeze [42]

Explanation:  Reformation and Calvinism relate to changes in the Church, the appearance of a different opinion and attitude that led to Protestantism, and the important fact that the Pope does not have to be supreme authority, primarily religious and secular, since in the Middle Ages the Church also brought religious and secular decisions. The colonization of America, on the other hand, has, during its history, led to the perception of revolution as its natural law, which can not be suppressed either by the king or by any authority. Both Protestantism and colonization of America will, in the long run, lead to the idea of ​​individualism as the right of everyone to be able to develop, educate, advance, and not according to the will of someone.

Thus, even at the end of the Middle Ages, when the nobility on their estates, feuds, possessed the servants and knights and decided their fate, a class of people, bankers, traders and craftsmen slowly appeared, which especially strengthened with the appearance of the Renaissance. This class of people ran around the edge of feud and offered their services. An atmosphere has already been created in which people who did not possess great feuds have found ways to enrich and advance. Protestantism and the New World with new possibilities have been a perfect ground for strengthening such a class as entrepreneurs, new business relationships have been created that have become more and more prominent.

Conditions have been created for the realization of new ideas and ways of earning, where everyone as an individual has the right to personal life and progress.  Thus a new class of bankers, traders called the bourgeoisie, appeared, which would later launch a series of revolutions for the exercise of their rights and the overthrow of authority, kings, nobility.

The system they will create is capitalism and will organize the social system differently. This system was not based on the great kingdoms consist of many ethnic groups, but the idea of ​​a nation-state. These ideas were assisted by the ideas of the Enlightenment, the natural rights of citizens, who are entitled to choose their own authority and to change it, and thus exercise their rights. This is all the more convenient in the national states.

Modern nation states, as well as capitalism as a system of social relations, economics, draw their roots precisely from these ideas. All Protestant reforms, the colonization of America and the creation of a new world with new ideals of freedom, revolutions that led to the possibility of exercising civil rights, the idea of ​​individuation and the realization that they do not need the Pope or the King to exercise their rights have led to what is today's nation state with a market economy.

3 0
3 years ago
What comes to mind when you hear the word “freedom”?
Georgia [21]

Answer:

when it come freedom in my mind i feel like free

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Compare the pharaohs of ancient Egypt to our modern-day presidents. List at least three ways they are similar.
abruzzese [7]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.

The three ways in that the pharaohs of ancient Egypt were similar to our modern-day presidents are the following.

1.- They had to rule over a big portion of land.

2.- They were responsible to maintain law and order in their kingdom, as modern Presidents are the leaders of the government and oversee the departments of the cabinet in the executive branch.

3.- They were respected and had a prominent public image in society and had to deal with other foreign kings and kingdoms, as our modern-day presidents are the main leaders of the nations and are the chief diplomats.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Sue and Tim are arguing about the value of appointing rather than electing federal judges. Sue says the judges should be elected
Serhud [2]

Judges are representatives of the people in government just like other officials and should represent the majority will is the statement which supports her position.

In the United States, federal judges are judges who serve in courts established under Article 3 of the United States Constitution. Federal judges, known as “Article 3 Judges,” include the Chief Justice and Deputy Judges of the United States. Supreme Court, US Circuit Judges Court of Appeals, US District Judges US District Courts, and Judges International Trade Court.

The US. Federal judges are not elected officials. They are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate pursuant to Article 2 of the U.S. Constitution. The U.S. Constitution gives federal judges life, and they hold their seats until they die, resign, or are impeached.

Learn more about Government here: brainly.com/question/1078669

#SPJ4

5 0
2 years ago
Olivia and Hannah, two friends who are medical practitioners, buy a car by contributing $1000 each. Olivia takes the car when sh
krok68 [10]

Answer:

C. an equitable relationship

Explanation:

An equitable relationship -

It is the method , which helps to find out whether the distribution of resources is done evenly or not , by the end of both the partners , is known as an equitable relationship .

The measurement of the equity is done by considering and calculating the ratio of the contribution and the use of all the person involved it .

Any type of inequality in the equity may lead to disturbance in the relationship , and can lead to some negative outcome .

Hence , from the scenario given in the question , an equitable relationship is established .

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did the great awakening help lead to the american revolution
    8·1 answer
  • More than ninety percent of defendants appearing before the courts plead ___________ prior to the trial stage.
    13·1 answer
  • How did the Northwest Ordinance of 1787 reflect Thomas Jefferson's ideas?​
    14·2 answers
  • 1. Think about the communication phenomena that scholars study. Which aspects of communication intrigued you the most in this we
    5·1 answer
  • Why do geographers rely heavily on satellites to gayer geographic data
    15·1 answer
  • Name 2 advantages for americans & 2 for british in rev.war
    10·1 answer
  • How does Washington conclude that the graduates of Tuskegee Normal and Industrial Institute will influence America?
    8·1 answer
  • Pls help me i need the answers
    13·1 answer
  • Caribbean music is known for its percussion, a tradition strongly
    14·2 answers
  • What is plebiscite. explain​
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!