If you divide the numerator by the denominator using a calculator, you will be able to see the values in a more numerical fashion and organize them from there.
for example, for part a,
3 divided by 5 = 0.6
1 divided by 6 = 1.666
2 divided by 3 = 0.666
meaning your answer would be 3/5, 2/3, and 1/6 if arranged in increasing order.
b) 1/3, 1/2, 5/7
c) 1/5, 3/4, 7/8
d) 1/2, 2/3, 7/10, 4/5
e) 1/2, 2/3, 5/6, 8/9
f) 2/5, 1/2, 7/10, 3/4
Simplify the following:
2^3 (4×36/12 + 1/4)
4×36/12 = (4×36)/12:
2^3 ((4×36)/12 + 1/4)
2^3 = 2×2^2:
2×2^2 ((4×36)/12 + 1/4)
2^2 = 4:
2×4 ((4×36)/12 + 1/4)
2×4 = 8:
8 ((4×36)/12 + 1/4)
36/12 = (12×3)/12 = 3:
8 (4×3 + 1/4)
4×3 = 12:
8 (12 + 1/4)
Put 1/4 + 12 over the common denominator 4. 1/4 + 12 = 1/4 + (4×12)/4:
8 1/4 + (4×12)/4
4×12 = 48:
8 (1/4 + 48/4)
1/4 + 48/4 = (1 + 48)/4:
8 (1 + 48)/4
1 + 48 = 49:
8×49/4
8×49/4 = (8×49)/4:
(8×49)/4
8/4 = (4×2)/4 = 2:
2×49
2×49 = 98:
Answer: 98
Answer:
f jb gfbjfmnb fjb
Step-by-step explanation:
f bmf bknmf
Answer:
Given:
Sham: n= 20, x=0.44, s=1.24,
Magnet:n= 20, x =0.49, s= 0.95
For Sham:
Sample size, n = 20
Sample mean = 0.44
Standard deviation = 1.24
For Magnet:
Sample size = 20
Sample mean = 0.49
Standard deviation = 0.95
The null and alternative hypotheses:
H0: s1²=s2²
H1: s1² ≠ s2²
a) To find the test statistics, use the formula:
Test statistics = 1.7037
b) P-value:
Sham: degrees of freedom 
Magnet: degrees of freedom
The critical values:
[Za/2, df1, df2)], [(1 - Za/2), df1, df2]
![f[0.05/2, 19, 19], f[(1 - 0.05/2), 19, 19]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20f%5B0.05%2F2%2C%2019%2C%2019%5D%2C%20f%5B%281%20-%200.05%2F2%29%2C%2019%2C%2019%5D%20)
![f[0.025, 19, 19], f[0.975, 19, 19]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20f%5B0.025%2C%2019%2C%2019%5D%2C%20f%5B0.975%2C%2019%2C%2019%5D%20)
The rejection region:
Reject H0, if F < 0.3958 or if F > 2.526
c) Conclusion:
Since the critical values of test statistic is between (0.3958 < 1.7037 < 2.526), we fail to reject null hypothesis H0.
There is insufficient evidence to to support the claim that those given a sham treatment have reductions that vary more than those treated with magnets
Answer:
AC= 20
Step-by-step explanation:
since the two figures are similar, CB Is congruent to FD
since image/preimage, 12/3 =4
The dilation is 4.
AC is congruent to EF
EF=5
4 x 5 = 20
AC=20
someone correct me if im wrong :)
