The contention that since there are cross-country or cross-cultural differences in ethical standards, it is appropriate to judge
behavior as ethical/unethical in the light of local customs and social mores should take precedence over a single set of ethical standards or what may be applicable in a company's home market a. defines what is meant by ethical relativism b. is the guiding principle for religious and moral standards across countries and cultures c. is the foundation of a social contract d. defines what is meant by ethical universalism e. is the basis for the theory of ethical variation.
<em>The contention that since there are cross-country or cross-cultural differences in ethical standards, it is appropriate to judge behavior as ethical/unethical in the light of local customs and social mores should take precedence over a single set of ethical standards or what may be applicable in a company's home market.</em>
This is quite a definition for Ethical Relativism, a branch of ethics that holds that there is autonomy concerning the norms of each and every culture.
Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that this defines what is meant by ethical relativism. Since the formal definition of this term refers to a theory that beliefs that morality is relative to the norms of one's culture, meaning that the current location's culture has the right to dictate what is morally/ethically correct based on their customs.
The correct answer is A. Organisms pass on acquired traits to evolve into more advanced life forms. This is because of natural selection and the mantra, "the survival of the fittest".
Since cell division occurs twice during meiosis, one starting cell can produce four gametes (eggs or sperm). In each round of division, cells go through four stages: prophase, metaphase, anaphase, and telophase
