Because Bermuda has a strange that no one can explain, and people have disappeared with no good explanation. Lots of ship, and planes has disappeared and I don't know why, that when you go in Bermuda you gonna disappeared, maybe the Bermuda has a different world that has a portal because they didn't found any body in Bermuda, and I'm not sure about this. But I believe that the Greeks believe Poseidon that he is a great god and lots of people didn't believed the great gods such as Zeus. People can disappear anywhere. There is nothing special about the Bermuda Triangle. It is claimed that more than 1,000 people have disappeared in the Bermuda Triangle, this has not been proven. Though myth and scare mongering has to be taken into account making it about 750 people who have actually become lost in the Bermuda triangle. The Bermuda triangle is a large triangle that sucks you in and makes you become a fish because they didn't found any body of person and I believed that the person has lost, live in the lost city of Atlantis.
Hope this is helps:)
Answer:
C. external taxes.
Explanation:
In 1767, The British government passed several laws which were known as the Townshend Acts which It included the introduction of taxes on imported goods such as glasses, paper, and paint with the aim of generating funds for the payment of British officials serving in the colonies.Taxes on goods imported to a country or colony as in the case of Townshend Acts are regarded as external taxes why taxes on goods produced within a country/colony are regarded as internal tax, stamp duties are internal tax.
Answer:
the American perspective would be a good job ,a good home , a great family just a good life
Explanation:
because not all americans are true americans there are some americans who came from really messed up places so all that stuff is great
Answer:
B.mental health professionals could not reliably assess whether mental illness caused criminal behavior
Explanation:
Judge David Bazelon was who proposed to do a scientific exam about mental illness in the criminal area. In the end, his ruling established that the defendant was not responsible for his criminal act if he was suffering from being mentally unstable. However, there is no verifiable certainty that the defendant, because of his illness, committed the crimes.
