Answer: Edward Thorndike law of effect.
Explanation:The law of effect suggested that responses closely followed by satisfaction will become firmly attached to the situation and, therefore, more likely to reoccur when the situation is repeated. Conversely, if the situation is followed by discomfort, the connections to the situation will become weaker, and the behavior of response is less likely to occur when the situation is repeated.
In the case of Todd, the act of reading to him brings so much satisfaction to him that he request for books to be continually read to him. Conversely, because of of discomfort washing his hair brings, hes connection to the situation is weak and thus goes into hiding anytime he sees his parent with shampoo because he assumes that they want to wash his hair.
6 Social Issues that Need Policy Changes
Access to Education.
Hunger and Poverty.
Women's and Girls' Rights.
Career Opportunities. ...
Access to Health Care. ...
International Development.
Answer:
The missing options are:
A. Potential confounding variables are not always controlled din laboratory studies
.
B. Retention tests employed in laboratory studies are usually once merged with factual information rather than emotions
.
C. The intensity of emotional responses is more accurately measured after the event in laboratory studies
.
D. Memories and emotional experiences as in real life are very different from those generated in laboratory studies.
The correct answer is option D.
Explanation:
Generalizability measures how useful is what scientists have been studying in a laboratory in comparison with the real-life since the first option is a prototype of reality that can miss valuable variables that can have an impact on the real life. With generalizability, we can see if the results of the investigation and the process that scientists used are useful in real life and can apply to other things or communities. The efficiency of generalizability depends on how well the representation of reality was in the laboratory.
Answer: An example of how individual actions are constrained by sociological circumstances is (D) David's decision to abstain from eating pork because his religion demands it.
Explanation: The concept "sociological circumstance" is used to refer to<u> the social factors, such as ideas, principles or activities, that surround and have an influence on a particular individual.</u> In that way, sociological circumstances limit a person's behaviour and actions. David's decision to abstain from eating pork because his religion demands it is an example of a constraint generated by a sociological circumstance because<u> the principles of the religion he believes in and that surrounds him restrict his choices.</u> In other words, <u>his religion limits the way in which David is supposed to act and eat. </u>
