Answer:
multiplying both-side of the equation by 3
substituting 36 for p to check the solution
Step-by-step explanation:
To solve the equation p/3 = 12, we will follow the steps below;
first multiply 3 to both-side of the equation, that is:
p/3 × 3 = 12 × 3
On the left-hand side of the equation, 3 at the numerator will cancel-out 3 at the denominator, leaving us with just p while on the right-hand side of the equation 12 will be multiplied by 3
p= 36
To check the correctness of the equation, we can substitute p = 36 back into the equation and then check, that is;
p/3 = 12
36/3 = 12
This implies p = 36 is correct
We'll use standard labeling of right triangle ABC, C=90 degrees, legs a, b, hypotenuse c.
11.
Right triangle, cliff peak A, boat B, angle opposite cliff is B=28.9 deg. adjacent leg a=65.7 m, cliff height is leg b.
tan B = b/a
b = a tan B = 65.7 tan 28.9° = 36.3 m
12.
Similar story, boat at B, opposite b=3.5 m, rope c=12 m
sin B = b/c
B = arcsin b/c = arcsin (3.5/12) = 17.0°
13.
c=124 m, A=58°
sin A = a/c
a = c sin A = 124 sin 58 = 105.2 m
14.
That's a hypotenuse c=4-1.2 = 2.8 m to a height b=1.8m so
cos A = b/c
A = arccos b/c = arccos (1.8/2.8) = 50.0°
15.
Not a right triangle, an isosceles triangle. Half of it is a right triangle with hypotenuse one arm, c=9.8 cm and angle opposite half the base of B=62/2=31°. We're after d=2b:
sin B = b/c
b = c sin B
d = 2b = 2 c sin B = 2(9.8) sin 31 = 10.1 cm
Almost equilateral
Answer:
For the reasons mentioned in the explanation section, it is indeed a weak generalization:
Step-by-step explanation:
- No, there is not enough data provided on certain subjects' age, socioeconomic status, etc. that may have influenced the investing decision.
- No, the survey isn't random, the study is irregular because each has a fair probability of expressing their true beliefs, here in this query it's written they've been told individuals are given actual medication, which may have contributed to the Hawthorne studies giving incorrect outcomes.
- No, the amount isn't sufficient mostly on the premise of 28 subject areas with be provided oxytocin, and therefore only one test being performed should we not be able to determine the results to implement for certain persons including billions of populace, it would be a hurried generalization.
Answer:
b i think
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
c) 1
Step-by-step explanation:
f(x) = g(x)
-x+2 = 5x-4
+x +x
2 = 6x -4
+4 +4
6 = 6x
(divide both sides by 6)
1 = x
