Answer:
the Three-Fifths Compromise vs. the Great Compromise
Explanation:
When the Articles of Confederation underwent revision, there were many issues that were discussed. One of the major issues was the debate over the the Three-Fifths Compromise vs. the Great Compromise. According to the Great Compromise, an equal right was to be distributed among the citizens to choose the representatives.
In the Three-Fifths Compromise, no debates were initiated on the issue of the complete abolition of slavery and granting them the citizenship. The slaves were agreed to be counted to be the three-fifth of the individual who were liable for taxation and representation.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
The ways in that the principles established in the Declaration reflected the political transformations taking place throughout the age of Atlantic revolutions were that the principles established in the Declaration of Independence were so valid for other nations that lived under the oppression of European monarchies that were cruel and absolutist, as was the case of France, for instance.
Indeed, the principles of equality, liberty, and rights for the citizens are universal and could be applied in other parts of the world. These principles were the basis for the Independence of Haiti or the many independence movements in México and Latin America.
Answer:
The social pressures that contributed to English colonization of north America had to do with religious, politics and economics matters. Bearing in mind that religion was the main factor contributing to the English migration, the Puritans fled to America from England to gain their religious freedom.
Locke's contribution to American political thought was the way he formulated liberal thought. In Locke's thought, men have intrinsic moral worth. They are capable of being their own moral agents, thus capable of self rule. They are equal, and they are free from claims of divine right to rule. This is liberalization, meaning that traditional ruling systems of personal power, justified by divine right, are rejected. The political power is opened up to the people, and "opening" is what liberalism means. When the people have the sovereign power, power becomes a public matter. In Latin, that is "Res Publica." Self rule is a republic. The power of the people is delegated to representatives to speak on their behalf so people have a stable environment in which to pursue economic activity.
Since men are free and equal, then, they have natural rights. These are life, liberty, health, and pursuit of property. Property is the source of political power, hence freedom, and this comes with the obligation to defend it so you don't lose that liberty. You cannot alienate your natural rights. You must set up a system to limit encroachments and preserve your rights. So you must have the ability to protect your freedom, which is the right to pursue property. Jefferson cribbed this line but he changed "property" to "happiness."
<span>Fugitive Slave Act
The Act standout amongst the most questionable components of the 1850 bargain and uplifted Northern feelings of trepidation of a "slave control scheme". It required that all got away slaves were, upon catch, to be sent back to their lords and that authorities and residents of free states needed to coordinate in this law. End to slavery campaigners nicknamed it the bloodhound law because those were the kind of animals that were utilised to find runaway slaves</span>
