Answer:
![SA(x) = x^2 + \frac{12}{x}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=SA%28x%29%20%3D%20x%5E2%20%2B%20%5Cfrac%7B12%7D%7Bx%7D)
Step-by-step explanation:
Given
--- volume
![x \to base\ length](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=x%20%5Cto%20base%5C%20length)
![y \to height](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=y%20%5Cto%20height)
Required
The surface area as a function of base length
The volume (V) is calculated as:
![V = Base\ Area * Height](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=V%20%3D%20Base%5C%20Area%20%2A%20Height)
![V = x*x*y](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=V%20%3D%20x%2Ax%2Ay)
![V = x^2*y](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=V%20%3D%20x%5E2%2Ay)
Make y the subject
![y = \frac{V}{x^2}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=y%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7BV%7D%7Bx%5E2%7D)
Substitute 3 for V
![y = \frac{3}{x^2}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=y%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B3%7D%7Bx%5E2%7D)
The surface area of the open box is:
![SA = x^2 + 2xy+2xy](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=SA%20%3D%20x%5E2%20%2B%202xy%2B2xy)
![SA = x^2 + 4xy](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=SA%20%3D%20x%5E2%20%2B%204xy)
Substitute: ![y = \frac{3}{x^2}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=y%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B3%7D%7Bx%5E2%7D)
![SA = x^2 + 4x*\frac{3}{x^2}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=SA%20%3D%20x%5E2%20%2B%204x%2A%5Cfrac%7B3%7D%7Bx%5E2%7D)
![SA = x^2 + 4*\frac{3}{x}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=SA%20%3D%20x%5E2%20%2B%204%2A%5Cfrac%7B3%7D%7Bx%7D)
![SA = x^2 + \frac{12}{x}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=SA%20%3D%20x%5E2%20%2B%20%5Cfrac%7B12%7D%7Bx%7D)
Hence, the function is:
![SA(x) = x^2 + \frac{12}{x}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=SA%28x%29%20%3D%20x%5E2%20%2B%20%5Cfrac%7B12%7D%7Bx%7D)
So, a full circle has 360°, thus when the minute hand does one hour, it does a full circle, therefore 360°.
now, how many degrees are there in 1 minute? well, there are 60 minutes in 360°, therefore there are 360/60 degrees in 1 minute, or 6°.
now, we know in 1 hour there are 360°, how many in 27 minutes? well, 27 * 6, or 162°. So after 1hr and 27min, the minute hand has done 360+162 or 522°.
we also know the minute hand is 2 inches long, thus
![\bf \textit{arc's length}\\\\ s=\cfrac{\pi \theta r}{180}\quad \begin{cases} r=radius\\ \theta =angle~in\\ \qquad degrees\\ ------\\ r=2\\ \theta =522 \end{cases}\implies s=\cfrac{\pi \cdot 522\cdot 2}{180}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cbf%20%5Ctextit%7Barc%27s%20length%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C%0As%3D%5Ccfrac%7B%5Cpi%20%5Ctheta%20r%7D%7B180%7D%5Cquad%20%0A%5Cbegin%7Bcases%7D%0Ar%3Dradius%5C%5C%0A%5Ctheta%20%3Dangle~in%5C%5C%0A%5Cqquad%20degrees%5C%5C%0A------%5C%5C%0Ar%3D2%5C%5C%0A%5Ctheta%20%3D522%0A%5Cend%7Bcases%7D%5Cimplies%20s%3D%5Ccfrac%7B%5Cpi%20%5Ccdot%20522%5Ccdot%202%7D%7B180%7D)
which is roughly 18 inches rounded up.
The angle would be 70 degrees because 180-110=70
<span>The
content of any course depends on where you take it--- even two courses
with the title "real analysis" at different schools can cover different
material (or the same material, but at different levels of depth).
But yeah, generally speaking, "real analysis" and "advanced calculus"
are synonyms. Schools never offer courses with *both* names, and
whichever one they do offer, it is probably a class that covers the
subject matter of calculus, but in a way that emphasizes the logical
structure of the material (in particular, precise definitions and
proofs) over just doing calculation.
My impression is that "advanced calculus" is an "older" name for this
topic, and that "real analysis" is a somewhat "newer" name for the same
topic. At least, most textbooks currently written in this area seem to
have titles with "real analysis" in them, and titles including the
phrase "advanced calculus" are less common. (There are a number of
popular books with "advanced calculus" in the title, but all of the ones
I've seen or used are reprints/updates of books originally written
decades ago.)
There have been similar shifts in other course names. What is mostly
called "complex analysis" now in course titles and textbooks, used to be
called "function theory" (sometimes "analytic function theory" or
"complex function theory"), or "complex variables". You still see some
courses and textbooks with "variables" in the title, but like "advanced
calculus", it seems to be on the way out, and not on the way in. The
trend seems to be toward "complex analysis." hope it helps
</span>
A. 5
B. -3/1
C. Negative
D. You have to go down 3 over to the right one from where your y-intercept is.
To plot the y intercept plot (0,5)
To plot the next point go down 3 over 1 to the right from the y-ing