All categories

2 years ago

Victor writes 10 more poems than ann.Ann writes 10 poems. How many poems does victor writes?

Mathematics

2 answers:

Alja [10]2 years ago

6 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation: 10 + 10 = victor

10 + 10 =20

tino4ka555 [31]2 years ago

3 0

Victor writes 20 poems

Solution:

Given that victor writes 10 more poems than Ann

Also given that Ann writes 10 poems

To find: number of poems written by Victor

From given information, we can frame a equation as:

number of poems written by Victor = 10 more poems than Ann

number of poems written by Victor = 10 + number of poems written by Ann

Substituting the given , number of poems written by Ann = 10 , we get,

number of poems written by Victor = 10 + 10 = 20

Thus victor writes 20 poems

You might be interested in

The points (1, 7) and (0, 2) fall on a particular line. What is its equation in slope-intercept form?

NARA [144]

Slope-intercept form is y = mx + b

So we can manage to do this:

(y - yo) = m.(x - xo)

Where (x, y) and (xo, yo) are points of this line, this way we can discover the slope.

(7 - 2) = m.(1 - 0)

5 = m

m = 5

So,

y = 5x + b

Now we still have to use (y - yo) = m.(x - xo), but this time we will put only 1 point and the slope.

(y - yo) = m.(x - xo)

(y - 2) = 5.(x - 0)

y - 2 = 5x

y = 5x + 2

So, this is the line in slope-intercept form.

4 0

3 years ago

X=3 and y=(-2), find the value of 2x -- 3y

Leni [432]

2(3)-3(-2)=6-(-6)=6+6=12

4 0

2 years ago

Sam ran 2

daser333 [38]

In total he ran 19 miles based off of how the question looks. It looks like I needed to add each number up.

5 0

2 years ago

Help 7th grade math need fast please

Vika [28.1K]

Answer:

It's 4800, just multiply 60x80 bc the population is 80x larger than the sample of 100

8 0

3 years ago

In a study of the accuracy of fast food drive-through orders, McDonald’s had 33 orders that were not accurate among 362 orders o

melomori [17]

Answer:

A. We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that the true proportion of inaccurate orders p is 0.1.

B. Null hypothesis: $p=0.1$

Alternative hypothesis: $p \neq 0.1$

C. $z=\frac{0.0912 -0.1}{\sqrt{\frac{0.1(1-0.1)}{362}}}=-0.558$

D. $z_{\alpha/2}=-1.96$ $z_{1-\alpha/2}=1.96$

E. Fail to the reject the null hypothesis

F. So the p value obtained was a very high value and using the significance level given $\alpha=0.05$ we have $p_v>\alpha$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 5% of significance the true proportion of inaccurate orders is not significantly different from 0.1.

Step-by-step explanation:

Data given and notation

n=362 represent the random sample taken

X=33 represent the number of orders not accurate

$\hat p=\frac{33}{363}=0.0912$ estimated proportion of orders not accurate

$p_o=0.10$ is the value that we want to test

$\alpha=0.05$ represent the significance level

Confidence=95% or 0.95

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

$p_v$ represent the p value (variable of interest)

A: Write the claim as a mathematical statement involving the population proportion p

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that the true proportion of inaccurate orders p is 0.1.

B: State the null (H0) and alternative (H1) hypotheses

Null hypothesis: $p=0.1$

Alternative hypothesis: $p \neq 0.1$

When we conduct a proportion test we need to use the z statistic, and the is given by:

$z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o (1-p_o)}{n}}}$ (1)

The One-Sample Proportion Test is used to assess whether a population proportion $\hat p$ is significantly different from a hypothesized value $p_o$ .

C: Find the test statistic

Since we have all the info required we can replace in formula (1) like this:

$z=\frac{0.0912 -0.1}{\sqrt{\frac{0.1(1-0.1)}{362}}}=-0.558$

D: Find the critical value(s)

Since is a bilateral test we have two critical values. We need to look on the normal standard distribution a quantile that accumulates 0.025 of the area on each tail. And for this case we have:

$z_{\alpha/2}=-1.96$ $z_{1-\alpha/2}=1.96$

P value

It's important to refresh the p value method or p value approach . "This method is about determining "likely" or "unlikely" by determining the probability assuming the null hypothesis were true of observing a more extreme test statistic in the direction of the alternative hypothesis than the one observed". Or in other words is just a method to have an statistical decision to fail to reject or reject the null hypothesis.

The significance level provided $\alpha=0.05$ . The next step would be calculate the p value for this test.

Since is a bilateral test the p value would be:

$p_v =2*P(z$

E: Would you Reject or Fail to Reject the null (H0) hypothesis.

Fail to the reject the null hypothesis

F: Write the conclusion of the test.

So the p value obtained was a very high value and using the significance level given $\alpha=0.05$ we have $p_v>\alpha$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 5% of significance the true proportion of inaccurate orders is not significantly different from 0.1.

6 0

3 years ago